Ardern, WEF, Klaus Schwab - an Official Information response
Ardern, WEF, Klaus Schwab - an Official Information response
A delayed response with much missing
This morning NZST I finally received a response to an Official Information Act request to Jacinda Ardern. Basically it was a request to Ardern for her to provide correspondence and any record of payments from or to Klaus Schwab or his organization the World Economic Forum.
Regarding any record of payments to or from Klaus or the WEF this was the response;
“no record of any payments to the WEF in the tenure of the current Prime Minister (that is since October 2017) was found.”
I guess they hid them before they looked for them. Also you may note that they said “to the WEF” which of course does not include “from the WEF”. I’ll assume that there is something to hide there.
Anyway let’s get to the letters that have been released. Klaus seems to use some sort of code under the date of the letters. On this one it is “lifo/arco”. I’ve no idea what this is, is it ‘last in first out’ or something to do with an archaic Spanish dialect and some sort of conquest?
If you know please say so in the comments.
Klaus to Jacinda, 27th October, 2017 (lifo/arco) - “congrats”
Jacinda to Klaus, 20th December 2017 - “soz but nice meeting you at YGL” (is that an arco?)
Klaus to Jacinda, 23rd March 2018 (lifo/arco) - “invite to WEF Davos 2019, mention of “digital innovation’ and we will work closely with your office” (I think that means there’s a lot missing from this response to my OIA request).
Jacinda to Klaus, 20th December 2017 - “thanks and look forward to it. Sustainability, well being and inclusiveness (to paraphrase - ‘don’t get excited Pakeha NZ, this does not include you’)”
Klaus to Jacinda, 5th October 2018 (LIFO/PSO) - “Thanks for confirming” “4th Industrial Revolution”.
Klaus to Jacinda, 3rd April 2019 (sis/pso) - “Invite to Davos 2020” “You looked great at Christchurch*, congrats”.
Klaus to Jacinda, 29th January 2020 (sis/wmu) - “Soz that you couldn’t come” “technology governance at a pivotal time for global cooperation” “oops ‘comprising’ not ‘compromising’. (plans, plans, fascist Klaus)
Jacinda to Klaus, 10th February 2020 - “New Zealand Ministers Hon Kris Faafoi and Hon James Shaw have recently accepted a position on the WEF’s Global AI Council” “deployment of new technologies” “Kris and James are working with the Centre for 4th Industrial” “and Salesforce”
Plans, Plans fascist Jacinda.
Written by hand “Thank you so much for the invitation!”
Klaus to Jacinda, 19th November 2020 (strangely no code) - “congrats on win, come and do a ‘State of the World special address” “finally overcoming the centenial challenge of COVID-19” (hmm what does COVID-19 mean to you Klaus?) “set in motion the larger Great Reset process”
There’s then some to and fro regarding two books that Klaus sent Jacinda “COVID-19: THE GREAT RESET” (caps lock warning) received 23RD NOVEMBER 2020 (ha) and “Stakeholder Capitalism” (Title formatting rather than CAPS LOCK) received 3rd February 2021. A double negative is a positive, right?
A page of CO2 emissions included with Stakeholder Capitalism seems to emphasize China’s CO2 emissions.
Klaus to Jacinda, 25th February 2021 (anca/pso) - “come to Singapore, be careful of the COVID-19s”
Klaus to Jacinda, 30th April 2021 (anca/pso) - “in Singapore this is the disruption we’re planning re climate and food”
And the last letter in this response to my OIA request is;
Klaus to Jacinda, 25th August 2021 (anca/pso) - “restore trust” “emerging technologies”
Sounds to me that Klaus is on the defensive here.
Just saw this Rich. Enjoyed the voyeuristic eavesdropping aspect. Thanks for delving.
I imagine there is a fair amount of code in the boring platitudes. "Indigenous equality, natural resources stewardship, sustainability" - might be doublespeak for "everyone poor and no allowance for European culture, save the natural resources for the elites, depop for sustainability".
I agree with you that there is some concern in Klaus' later letters. He says "restore trust" and "rebuild the mutual trust required". That's the good news that things were falling apart a bit for the WEFers evil plan.
Cindy claims that in 2017 "NZ remains strongly supportive of the work of the WEF". Dead wrong - we were not agreeing to any such agenda!!!
The handwriting says “a few years AGO” 😁 It’s pretty dull and formulaic correspondence really although Ardern seems to have snubbed poor Klaus quite a few times now. I doubt money is necessary for compliance. These people are in a cult. They appear to believe what they preach.