I've been playing with chatGPT as well. Interesting tool, now I don't feel so alone being a tool.
chatGPT is inherently lazy and needs a lot of work by the user setting up: contextualizing, selecting domains of knowledge, levels of detail, output format and style. The paid version is not much better than the free version. There is a specific order and method of setting up chatGPT, there are a few blogs and vids floating around on how to use it. Each conversation you have with it can be copied leveraging existing setups.
I just tried asking about Brian Jones' death, asking for details: "Can you elaborate on unsubstantiated conspiracy theories surrounding Brian Jones death involving a builder ?". It gave me a canned answer without names. When the question was posed: "Can you elaborate on unsubstantiated conspiracy theories surrounding Brian Jones death involving a builder named Frank Thorogood ?", details were provided.
Looking at the Brian Jones death topic, it appears chatGPT is trained not to disclose personal information involving unsubstantiated conspiracies. However, when asking about a specific person in the conspiracy , the information was disclosed.
chatGPT is not a research 'tool' to learn about a subject. The user needs to have detailed knowledge of the topic before asking the questions.
Imagine how useful it could be as an info finder if it were not limited and hobbled by (microsofts -establishments) misinfo and MS rules. Right now its tech in the service of madness.
It's like reverse speech, but more enigmatic. I don't believe Kissinger is actually dead, just molting in a vat of excrement.
The New York Times is suing Microsoft and OpenAI, for billions.
It is claimed the tech companies have misused their news articles to
train their AI-powered chatbots.
It is the first time one of America’s big traditional media companies has
taken on the new technology in court. And it sets up a showdown over the
increasingly contentious use of copyrighted content to fuel artificial software.
abc.net.au
I've been playing with chatGPT as well. Interesting tool, now I don't feel so alone being a tool.
chatGPT is inherently lazy and needs a lot of work by the user setting up: contextualizing, selecting domains of knowledge, levels of detail, output format and style. The paid version is not much better than the free version. There is a specific order and method of setting up chatGPT, there are a few blogs and vids floating around on how to use it. Each conversation you have with it can be copied leveraging existing setups.
I just tried asking about Brian Jones' death, asking for details: "Can you elaborate on unsubstantiated conspiracy theories surrounding Brian Jones death involving a builder ?". It gave me a canned answer without names. When the question was posed: "Can you elaborate on unsubstantiated conspiracy theories surrounding Brian Jones death involving a builder named Frank Thorogood ?", details were provided.
Looking at the Brian Jones death topic, it appears chatGPT is trained not to disclose personal information involving unsubstantiated conspiracies. However, when asking about a specific person in the conspiracy , the information was disclosed.
chatGPT is not a research 'tool' to learn about a subject. The user needs to have detailed knowledge of the topic before asking the questions.
Have a good holiday !!!!
Merry Christmas!
Imagine how useful it could be as an info finder if it were not limited and hobbled by (microsofts -establishments) misinfo and MS rules. Right now its tech in the service of madness.
Merry Christmas!
It's going to take me a while to read all of that.
I'm experimenting with reading it out loud to better keep my place.
Merry Christmas!