Tending to opportunist at the moment but he and his wife did get training at John Hopkins (with a military connection) which looks very much like "how to conduct a pandemic" so I'm not ruling out the first. Also he took the jab and is on video telling a bunch of 15yo Hawaiians to get jabbed around 2021. And he has formed multiple companies to take military commissions. So he's done very well out of viruses and vaccines.
Wow. Yeah, I saw through this guy as soon as I heard him say in an interview about the "covid" "vaccines" something to the effect of, "I'd like to say a lot more, but if I did, I wouldn't be able to work anymore." People who aren't willing to lose everything for the truth aren't being truthful. IMHO
Thanks, his loyalties become more obvious all the time. Let's hope those who financially support his stack catch up with reality. (No one likes playing the fool, so imagine some resistance to accepting the increasingly clear truth about him.
Aug 15, 2023·edited Aug 15, 2023Liked by Richard Seager
I assumed so but pleased amusingly not obvious. Poly-Crisis is visiting for an unknown time. Preoccupying - perhaps years as far as I know - and my emotional technical skills are all used up. Quite an ordeal with little money securing the vices preventing murder of everyone I don't like at all with my worn well used blunt butter knife. Jorma only asked for his pistol and three round balls but no got.
You know on Twitter I'm restricted to one like. It's always a different person but unless my tweet gets retweeted then that's what I get stuck on. If I do get retweeted I might get 5 likes. If I want more than that I have to get out of the NZ/Oz milieu.
Here it seems about 6 likes (which happened here in about 60 minutes or less) then the censorship algorithm gets into action and maybe it might go to 9 likes in total over the next 24 hours. This one has been restacked about 3 times which is unusual for me.
Used to get a lot more than that and although I know my Mayoral campaign didn't help the stats here that's just about a year ago now. Going out to a ~1,000 more or less subscribers so it's starting to appear to me that Substack is Twittering itself into some "upgraded" censorship.
Censorship by algol is a hard row to hoe. To my eyes based on years of FB censorship twas a choice. My rant read by possibly as many as ten people drew massive censorship starting in 2016 with Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump her less evil twin. :). I laughed then. I laugh louder now. I do not care. The world is not changing by any post I make. I might but that is not the issue. Once upon a time the English Crown required a license to publish. Newton of course satisfied the censorship laws. Pornography would not but was more profitable to print. So the same printer publishing licensed thought could hang on the line Newton and Pornography hoping the licensing authority did not drop by.
The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making 🔍
University Of Chicago Press, 1, 1998
Adrian Johns 🔍
“In The Nature of the Book, a tour de force of cultural history, Adrian Johns constructs an entirely original and vivid picture of print culture and its many arenas—commercial, intellectual, political, and individual."A compelling exposition of how authors, printers, booksellers and readers competed for power over the printed page. . . . The richness of Mr. Johns's book lies in the splendid detail he has collected to describe the world of books in the first two centuries after the printing press arrived in England."—Alberto Manguel, Washington Times"[A] mammoth and stimulating account of the place of print in the history of knowledge. . . . Johns has written a tremendously learned primer."—D. Graham Burnett, New Republic"A detailed, engrossing, and genuinely eye-opening account of the formative stages of the print culture. . . . This is scholarship at its best."—Merle Rubin, Christian Science Monitor"The most lucid and persuasive account of the new kind of knowledge produced by print. . . . A work to rank alongside McLuhan."—John Sutherland, The Independent"Entertainingly written. . . . The most comprehensive account available . . . well documented and engaging."—Ian Maclean, Times Literary Supplement
Robert Malone has indeed been a very lucrative investment for biotech. Hmm, I haven't seen anywhere that he has enlightened the health freedom community of all his "help" for mankind.
RW Malone LLC successfully convinced tens of thousands into becoming paid subscribers to his Substack column—Who is Robert Malone.? Weekly feature, “Funny Fridays.”
Excellent work! Do you think Malone is an outright intelligence asset or just an opportunist jumping on the bandwagon (as your image suggests)?
Tending to opportunist at the moment but he and his wife did get training at John Hopkins (with a military connection) which looks very much like "how to conduct a pandemic" so I'm not ruling out the first. Also he took the jab and is on video telling a bunch of 15yo Hawaiians to get jabbed around 2021. And he has formed multiple companies to take military commissions. So he's done very well out of viruses and vaccines.
Holee shite….! Massive work, excellent presentation👍🏻👍🏻 …that rounder needs to be exposed for everything he has manipulated.
Wow. Yeah, I saw through this guy as soon as I heard him say in an interview about the "covid" "vaccines" something to the effect of, "I'd like to say a lot more, but if I did, I wouldn't be able to work anymore." People who aren't willing to lose everything for the truth aren't being truthful. IMHO
Thanks, his loyalties become more obvious all the time. Let's hope those who financially support his stack catch up with reality. (No one likes playing the fool, so imagine some resistance to accepting the increasingly clear truth about him.
So now he's pretending he's Amish.
Looks that way. Truth is in the way that he walks not the way that he talks.
Fake walking as well?
I thought that accidentally he may have been saying that the way out of this was by Amishing.
"But.. but .. robert 's on our side. Isn't he?"
I have heard this response quiet a few times when I point Bobby boy is right in amongst it all
The Wayback has deep 6'd this data.
Wayback Machine has not archived that URL.
Click here to search for all archived pages under http://robertmalonemd.com/results.html
A slightly deeper did bring forth-https://web.archive.org/web/20220811102000/https://www.rwmalonemd.com/
It is there. Just not on public display I guess. There is a way of finding those...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160322184058/http://robertmalonemd.com/results.html
I assumed so but pleased amusingly not obvious. Poly-Crisis is visiting for an unknown time. Preoccupying - perhaps years as far as I know - and my emotional technical skills are all used up. Quite an ordeal with little money securing the vices preventing murder of everyone I don't like at all with my worn well used blunt butter knife. Jorma only asked for his pistol and three round balls but no got.
You know on Twitter I'm restricted to one like. It's always a different person but unless my tweet gets retweeted then that's what I get stuck on. If I do get retweeted I might get 5 likes. If I want more than that I have to get out of the NZ/Oz milieu.
Here it seems about 6 likes (which happened here in about 60 minutes or less) then the censorship algorithm gets into action and maybe it might go to 9 likes in total over the next 24 hours. This one has been restacked about 3 times which is unusual for me.
Used to get a lot more than that and although I know my Mayoral campaign didn't help the stats here that's just about a year ago now. Going out to a ~1,000 more or less subscribers so it's starting to appear to me that Substack is Twittering itself into some "upgraded" censorship.
Censorship by algol is a hard row to hoe. To my eyes based on years of FB censorship twas a choice. My rant read by possibly as many as ten people drew massive censorship starting in 2016 with Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump her less evil twin. :). I laughed then. I laugh louder now. I do not care. The world is not changing by any post I make. I might but that is not the issue. Once upon a time the English Crown required a license to publish. Newton of course satisfied the censorship laws. Pornography would not but was more profitable to print. So the same printer publishing licensed thought could hang on the line Newton and Pornography hoping the licensing authority did not drop by.
My authority. :). https://annas-archive.org/md5/bc73d506f9cca1f29f6b7a7b4e335e3e
The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making 🔍
University Of Chicago Press, 1, 1998
Adrian Johns 🔍
“In The Nature of the Book, a tour de force of cultural history, Adrian Johns constructs an entirely original and vivid picture of print culture and its many arenas—commercial, intellectual, political, and individual."A compelling exposition of how authors, printers, booksellers and readers competed for power over the printed page. . . . The richness of Mr. Johns's book lies in the splendid detail he has collected to describe the world of books in the first two centuries after the printing press arrived in England."—Alberto Manguel, Washington Times"[A] mammoth and stimulating account of the place of print in the history of knowledge. . . . Johns has written a tremendously learned primer."—D. Graham Burnett, New Republic"A detailed, engrossing, and genuinely eye-opening account of the formative stages of the print culture. . . . This is scholarship at its best."—Merle Rubin, Christian Science Monitor"The most lucid and persuasive account of the new kind of knowledge produced by print. . . . A work to rank alongside McLuhan."—John Sutherland, The Independent"Entertainingly written. . . . The most comprehensive account available . . . well documented and engaging."—Ian Maclean, Times Literary Supplement
Interesting link, havn't seen that before.
Robert Malone has indeed been a very lucrative investment for biotech. Hmm, I haven't seen anywhere that he has enlightened the health freedom community of all his "help" for mankind.
RW Malone LLC successfully convinced tens of thousands into becoming paid subscribers to his Substack column—Who is Robert Malone.? Weekly feature, “Funny Fridays.”
Sometimes such "authors" make me think that the black budget is spent on something, too. :)