97 Comments
User's avatar
Richard Seager's avatar

No Sam Bailey, no me, no Ray Horvath, no Andy Kaufmann, no Tom Cowan on the list.

Gosh I wonder why.

Also 85k websites to rate as anti-vaccination is a lot of work. That's not even a small team. It's a large one.

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

drsambailey.substack.com

www.drsambailey.substack.com = on the list.

but not Mark Bailey, her husband.

two Canadian historians who've never discussed health, cov or jabs made the list:

cynthiachung.substack.com / www.cynthiachung.substack.com and (her husband)

matthewehret.substack.com / www.matthewehret.substack.com

this is weird.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

It's definitely a Pharma list. Pushed through a young idiot who was probably paid a k or so to do it. Maybe with some help from 3 letter agencies.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

Mary-lou told me I was on the list! Yea, I am not an IT person but I don't see someone coming up with lists of thousands of sites on their own unless they splice other existing lists together... Had to have help from 3 letter agencies, NGOs and big tech... Will add your post to: https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/community-covid-resources/comments

Expand full comment
mary-lou's avatar

yes. it still doesn't explain why some non-Pharma authors are included, like the aforementioned Matt Ehret, Cynthia Chung, and Azra Dale (whose field of expertise lies in exposing the net-zero 'alternative' energy-fraud). perhaps the whole list is a case of over-zealous Ai.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

You're right about Sam Bailey. Also a bit odd that she (and others) are on twice with www and without it. I mean it will be the same site.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

You are not on it? So I see now you mention it. Strange.

Expand full comment
Fay's avatar

You may not have drawn attention to yourself as often your comments relating to

Covid are within posts on other topics.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

I do wonder if there any 'no such thing as a virus' accounts on the list. Because if not then we are 'dare not speak their name'.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Well, I'm on the list, and I am VERY anti-virus...so to speak. No such thing at all! But I know the real reason I was targeted has far more to do with the work I do to solve for the Ones selling the lies, the psychopaths in control (whatever Their group).

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

What surprises me is the number of previously respectable authors taking a full turn towards serving the globalists.

Expand full comment
Jon Grah's avatar

When did they first emerge as respectable? You have naturopaths and others who have been telling us about 90+% of what is happening today since before the 1990s.

University of Kemetian Sciences, Nation of Islam, Dr Shiva Ayyadurai, and several others. And they didn't bend or grift when the depopulation plan came to its visible stage in 2020.

I think many people preferred instead to be in the world AND of the world. I wouldn't be surprised if a larger panic situation (false flag mixed with real spiritual "foxtrot") happens that will sufficiently spook the masses into a mini civil war (technically already underway). A ceasefire will be settled upon based on a willingness to accept CBDC (or whatever it will be called)

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

That's certainly one of the potential scenarios, but the final concoction has dozens of potential combinations of destructive elements. I'm mostly surprised at the nearly full compliance at churches and synagogues. Strangely, not much was said about mosques.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

CBDC is a pipe dream (for them, for us it's a nightmare). It will never stick.

And I see that XRP honcho Chris Larsen's wallet was sucked dry of 112 million in the last few days. Why would you keep 112m in one wallet?

Expand full comment
Jon Grah's avatar

Money is already largely digital; Think credit/debit card transactions and "traditional" bank accounts (local bank transfers, SWIFT, bank transfer, etc). And then you have the numerous payment processors that allow a person to hold "funds" and transfer to someone within the network (paypal/Skrill/Neteller/PerfectMoney/LinePay/etc). Crypto was really a gateway to CBDCs; as a public ledger is much more traceable than cash. The CBDC will very likely be a private ledger (for your own protection).

CBDCs are really just the next logical step in top-down control of the fiat part of currency issuance and accounting. I suspect CBs/BIS will keep retail banks in play as they want to keep their hands more "hidden"/behind the scenes. Fun fact: Bank of International Settlements and World Economic Forum headquarters are both located in Switzerland.....how convenient.

Expand full comment
Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)'s avatar

Indeed. Only about 2-3% of the money exists in physical form. The rest is in forms of debts, and the interest siphons away the value of the currency. Other than that, all modern currencies are fiat, without any intrinsic value whatsoever. Still, they are indispensable for the continuity of production and distribution. Without it, billions would die in a few weeks...

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Printing it off willy nilly (quantitative easing in modern parlance) drives its value down as well. And results in the majority having a smaller share as the printing off goes to the likes of Blackrock.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

So is GAVI. And GAVI has Vatican style privileges.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

In regards to digital money being already in place although that's a fact and only about 3% of cash these days is actual cash, it doesn't try to restrict your spending or even cut you off completely from being able to spend, both of these being concerns with CBDCs which likely will be tied to ESGs that only the corporates can both be bothered with and can afford. Your corner store can't afford ESGs even if they wanted them (and they won't).

So CBDCs? You will only be able to purchase at ESG focused corporates.

Expand full comment
Victory Palace's avatar

Can’t believe I made the list!

Expand full comment
Rev. Tina's avatar

Ooh it's like a directory of who to subscribe to. Fab 😊

Expand full comment
Transcriber B's avatar

Hilarious! Fun to see my lil' ol' 'stack in some good company!

Expand full comment
Ann Glover's avatar

No Eugyppius? 🤯

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Interesting.

Expand full comment
Ann Glover's avatar

Eugyppius, Boriqua Gato, Tessa Lena, and Aaron Kheriaty are some of the top substackers who kept me sane during the worst of this continuing madness. If I hadn't found Substack, I wouldn't have found the resolve to stand up against the Malthusian monster that has become engorged with murderous purpose during the last four years.

Expand full comment
Transcriber B's avatar

I would have found the resolve because, well, I'm one tough old bug, but I have to say, I wholly agree wth you, these Substackers you mention, I cannot thank them enough. They were and are beacons of light— and that's no cliché, that's how it was. In 2020 and 2021 especially so many of us found ourselves suddenly and almost totally isolated in this psy-opped mess of panic and Jab Crow madness.

Expand full comment
Citizen Satirist (CS)'s avatar

I am going to add your post to https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/community-covid-resources/comments ANYONE CAN ADD RESOURCES IN COMMENTS...

Expand full comment
Patrick Jordan's avatar

I like lists.

Like the Hannukah Song by Adam Sandler. Gives you a brief glimpse into the reach of Family.

The list reproduced here was helpful to find decent folks who I might otherwise not be aware of.

That is called: The Law of Unintended Consequences.

So these minions did a service.

Ray Horvath sent me here so shout out to y'all.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

That's a little bit like that website Jew or not.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

Conspiracy tales, hmmm. 'You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means"

(meme) https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/010/692/You_Keep_Using_That_Word_meme_banner.jpg

Expand full comment
Stephen Simac's avatar

Doubling Doppelgangers to Drittegangers. my latest in case you didn't get it. https://open.substack.com/pub/stephensimac/p/israhell-drittegangers?r=c93k1&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Thanks. Have replied.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Priceless! I am on it and famous! Somebody loves me! "Get a grip Baldmichael!".

Well they do say fortune favours the bald.....something like that!

Anyway thanks Richard, we must be doing something right.

Expand full comment
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Wow! I made the list! And I haven't been on SS for a year yet! The psychopaths in control REALLY don't like My work to solve for Them!

Solving for Psychopaths in Control (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/solving-for-psychopaths-in-control

Expand full comment
Stephen Simac's avatar

I didn't make it either. Guess the competition is too stiff.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

You could complain to the management. :)

Expand full comment
Fakeologist's avatar

A great recommend list what a service he's done saved a million in-vain searches.

Expand full comment
Rob D's avatar

Well darn. Mine isn't on there. Looks like I may need to post more about the *religion* of "vaccination" to make the list. I'm always amazed that in a day where we have thousands and thousands of options as to what we read, watch, or listen to, people feel the need to "ban" or shut down anything they disagree with. I've always found it pretty easy to either turn the channel, unsubscribe or shut off something I don't want to be exposed to. I can only imagine that people who want to ban other people's opinions, views or truths, don't really have any of their own, or they know that the ones they have are based on lies and they are terrified that someone in their cabal of "true believers" will change their mind if they are exposed to someone else's views on a subject. It's really quite pathetic. If banning other's speech/content wasn't so damaging to liberty, it would be laughable.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

I figure they know why they want to ban. It's because the truth is anathema to what they want to install.

Expand full comment
kitten seeking answers's avatar

whoaaaaa KSG didn’t make the list, the loot buried in the pretty flower garden 😻😻😻… safe for now?

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

I guess you haven't 'pussed' them off enough yet. :)

You will have to get your klaus into Claws Schwab more. Or is it the other way round.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Kittens and flowers didn't trigger the algorithm.

(Keep doing your coded messages Kitten.)

Expand full comment
kitten seeking answers's avatar

🌼😹🌼😹🌼

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Seems that way….

Expand full comment
PhilH's avatar

I will certainly check these substacks out to confirm they are worthy of his ire.

Expand full comment
Stephen Simac's avatar

I guess, the real mystery is only 88,000?

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Too much work 888,000.

Expand full comment