His bolus theory is bullshit- just kidding, but trying to attribute all vaccine injuries to incompetent injectors is based on waving graphs around with one hand, while shoving dangerous reactions from toxic ingredients and immune systems with the other. I'm basically a germ terrain theorist, but not because I know enough to declare certainty.
In regards to virology and other fields like economics if truth does not fit the model so much the worse for truth. Models are worshipped like Moloch. True believers "know" they are right because their training taught them to believe only the model. Having past 23 days had a far too close an encounter with staff at Kaiser Hospital and I frequently unmasked despite Hospital rules I shake my head in despair.
Jan 16, 2023·edited Jan 16, 2023Liked by Richard Seager
20 posts required to take someone seriously. What does popularity prove? The principle reminds me of what someone I knew used to say, "Seven hundred quadrillion flies cannot be wrong. Let's eat shit!"
On the other hand, while quite a few authors "borrow" my ideas (which are usually quite unique, which makes it unlikely that others arrive at the same conclusions), I don't mind that they are also spreading the word. My problem is that they hardly ever give me credit. Igor, for one, wrote about the central AI several months after me without referring to me, and as far as I know, I was alone with my conjecturing for over a year.
I just discovered this! Nice!
We're not Sage Hana and I hate this comparison, but of course you're free to have any ideas/opinions you want on the internet!
Whatever who cares. I like your blog because you're getting the truth out about our no-virus reality, and that's all that's important to me.
Check out "LIES" - I hope you like it, (and I also mentioned you in one of the comments).
-Boostershots
His bolus theory is bullshit- just kidding, but trying to attribute all vaccine injuries to incompetent injectors is based on waving graphs around with one hand, while shoving dangerous reactions from toxic ingredients and immune systems with the other. I'm basically a germ terrain theorist, but not because I know enough to declare certainty.
This post now has 20 comments Igor. Just sayin'
I disconnected from him quite a while ago as I found him creepily manipulative.
In regards to virology and other fields like economics if truth does not fit the model so much the worse for truth. Models are worshipped like Moloch. True believers "know" they are right because their training taught them to believe only the model. Having past 23 days had a far too close an encounter with staff at Kaiser Hospital and I frequently unmasked despite Hospital rules I shake my head in despair.
At the time of that particular Igor post I thought that he was not the author.
Not his style.
20 posts required to take someone seriously. What does popularity prove? The principle reminds me of what someone I knew used to say, "Seven hundred quadrillion flies cannot be wrong. Let's eat shit!"
On the other hand, while quite a few authors "borrow" my ideas (which are usually quite unique, which makes it unlikely that others arrive at the same conclusions), I don't mind that they are also spreading the word. My problem is that they hardly ever give me credit. Igor, for one, wrote about the central AI several months after me without referring to me, and as far as I know, I was alone with my conjecturing for over a year.