It's a Rumble video that you can't embed directly into Substack. But if you click the graphic for it the link is still there and you should go directly to the video on Rumble.
"...Is there a virus?.... I just now sent off an email to Christine Massey challenging her, Lanka, Kaufman, Bailey, etc. to a debate on whether COVID is a virus or not. She received the email and is conferring with her colleagues. Let’s see if they accept. That will be fun. I bet I can sell tickets to that one...."
Nope. Steve Kirsch has always offered the most generous conditions for the other side in his debate offers, like even giving his debate evidence and arguments well in advance to the other side so they will be free to put together their counter-argument. You are starting to backtrack already before they have even responded.
After I heard Malone interviewed a few weeks ago and him saying (paraphrased), "I'd like to say a lot more about this (speaking about the "pandemic", "covid", etc) but I would lose my license", I lost all respect for him. There are hundreds of experts who have been willing to lose everything for this cause. Those are the ones I respect and am more likely to trust.
I have now listened to the video and want to re-listen because I missed stuff. How's them saying they can't isolate the virus because there isn't enough. What? We are the culture, as one doctor said. Why can't they find the virus in a human culture? So ridiculous. Malone just reverts to doctorese language to bamboozle but it doesn't mean shite.
Yeah, you & Kaufman just volunteer to go to Africa and treat the tentfulls of dying Ebola patients without the usual moon suit, full body and breathing apparatus protection, and we'll see how long you last.
Reacting out of FEAR is exactly the desired response. Consider that. If you want to live in fear, that's your choice... and it IS a choice... But when living in fear is mandated, then you've given up your ability to choose. Are you sure you trust oligarchs, or very greedy pharma operatives, to make that choice for you? Whatever the Truth is, however upsetting, isn't it better to look at it, clear-eyed, than to simply cower on command?
Who's living in Fear? I'm just talking science. I trust the oligarchs and big pharma as much as I trust a pissed off black mamba. It seems to me that people pushing out crap like "there are no viruses" or "viruses don't cause disease" are useful idiots, doing the bidding of the oligarchs and big Pharma by the standard off-the-shelf CIA disinformation tactic called "Poisoning the Well". Next you'll be telling us Covid is caused by Alien moonbeams. Fits very well with the CIA narrative that all those who critique vaccines and covid draconian measures are crackpots and nutballs.
That's what I thought when I first looked into 'viruses don't exist'. I thought misdirection and blackwashing the anti-covid movement with crazy viruses don't exist freaks. But a lot of what they say sounded rational. So then I wondered if the truth was somewhere in the middle. It was only after hearing people that I respected entertain the idea and I listened to the video put up by Rich that I started considering it seriously. Viruses are a great way to scare the public into taking vaccines, no questions asked. $$ I don't know, just trying to keep an open mind.
The science fraud is on the Rockefeller side of this argument. You know the side that has built the world's most profitable industry via the oil industry. The Germ theory crowd which is made up of the malicious who no more believe in germ theory than I do and the stupid who refuse to have a closer look at their jail walls.
Rockefeller's own the CIA and I don't know what you refer to as "Germ theory". It's viruses and bacteria. Both can be pathogenic. In this case it is a viral pathogen. The CIA loves crackpot theories that misdirect the focus from the critical issues:
1) The plandemic was preplanned with a bioengineered virus
2) The plandemic response was a disaster, made zero sense, had zero logic and devastated the world economy to the tune of $30T while costing millions of lives
3) The Covid vaccines are largely ineffective and they don't save lives, they cost lives, at the very minimum 4 all-cause deaths for every covid death saved (and that's for the alpha to delta strains which is all they're good for)
4) All the vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, mask mandates, covid lockdowns worsened overall public health, so could only have nefarious purposes of public oppression & control
5) They deliberately blockaded the dozens of effective & inexpensive treatments that prevent almost 100% of covid deaths and hospitalizations. No vaccines needed. $trillions saved. Insanity or deviousness. Pick one.
6) They deliberately murdered many citizens with nonsensical forced vaccine injuries and by using Remdesivir & intubation on hospitalized covid patients
7) They illegally refused to investigate the SARS-CoV-2 virus as a weapon of mass murder, at the very least mass manslaughter or 3rd degree murder. And have done nothing to prevent further bioweapon development.
Those are the REAL ISSUES. Those are the ESSENTIAL ISSUES. Don't misdirect effort into tangents that are 100% GUARANTEED to go nowhere and 100% GUARANTEED to ONLY protect the guilty, the evil-doers. Smarten the Fuck up!!!
"Rockefeller's own the CIA" - evidence please. Happy if you provide it, just that you should if you're going to claim it.
1) Pure speculation.
2) Yes, doesn't help your case though.
3) ibid
4) ibid
5) Claims that ivermectin and hydroxochloriquine worked against a non existent virus during a non existent pandemic are claims that have yet to be put to the test.
6) see 2, 3, 4.
7) ibid
".....Smarten the Fuck up!!!"
I am smart enough thanks. I have you worked out for example.
Jun 13, 2022·edited Jun 13, 2022Liked by Richard Seager
Bollocks. Show me the science. You appear to be convinced only by someone telling you what to think, and insults and insinuations just don't cut it. Show me your "science." And what the hell are you talking about, "black mamba"?? Are you racist, too? WTF.
I can show you the science. You can't. You sound like a cardboard cutout woke neoliberal, CIA puppy. Projection much. "Black mamba" Racist? Jesus. Do you even know what a black mamba is?
Jun 13, 2022·edited Jun 13, 2022Liked by Richard Seager
I looked up "black mamba." Sorry, I never claimed to be a herpetologist-- I should have known, another distraction. You tell me you can show me the science, but you're not doing that. You have NO CLUE who or what I am. LOL You're funny. But utterly, completely, ridiculously, wrong.
Sounds like Hollywood theatre to me. Who knows if there even were tents full of Ebola patients. Are you beginning to see a theme here? They lie. They lie all the time. It is all to give the appearance of scary diseases and create fear so they can sell vaccines and sterilise people probably.
I know they lie, I know they lie all the time, but it ain't them talking about the tents full of Ebola patients. That's all well known long before the big Psyop. This has been going on for a long time in Africa and other tropical locations, not just Ebola but Marburg and other hemorrhagic viruses.
Not just in Africa. The theater moved to the West 2 years ago via China (albeit I don't think China is a unique source, it's a global game). I got suspended from Linkedin for laughing at people doing the same costume larking in Auckland.
Uh, No. The people who live there are well aware of Ebola's deadly infection risk. And they literally run away when they see an escaped Ebola patient. Son, you wouldn't last long in that environment believing pseudo-science as you do.
Hi, Rich. I'm here after Elizabeth shared this post of yours. I saw that video, too. I've been into Cowan and Kaufman for quite a while now, and NOT into the other three doctors for less time, but for a while, too.
I guess it's POSSIBLE that these guys, Malone, McCullough, et al, really BELIEVE what they're saying... Maybe they're like the Mass Formation victims, they THINK they're right. My intuitive sense of Malone is that he's a liar, a charlatan, and a self-serving con man seeking to avoid retaliation for his part in genocide. I can't explain that, really... it's intuitive. But I'll tell you this: I trust my intuition, and I don't trust Malone, not one bit-- my alarm bells were all going off the first time I ever heard him speak. McCullough impresses me as a kind of brainwashed tool of the MIC, but there's something about him, too, like he's hoping to escape blame. The other guy seemed like he wished he hadn't agreed to be there, and I've had no other experience of him.
We know doctors are under heavy duty pressure to tow the narrative line... It takes some serious cojones to stand up and speak out against this fraud. So it's bound to cause a LOT of problems for our medical community to risk their careers, and their LIVES, during this time.
All Cowan and Kaufman want is transparency. Open discussion, scientific debate and investigation. Trying to determine whether or not someone is genuine seems like a waste of time. (although looking at their track record and affiliates should speak loudly) There are a lot of pieces in play here when it comes to the debate of germ theory versus terrain theory. A lot that needs to be understood about what we consider viruses and what else could explain the diseases we ascribe to them. As many are bringing up here.
But this debate is separate from the question of this particular 'vaccine' (s). Yes if the use of it is based on the possibly faulty premise of disease that needs clarity.
But in this moment it is the 'vaccines' themselves that are of biggest issue. And the death and destruction they are causing.
Germ and terrain theory needs to be discussed.
The insanity of the agenda as to the why of this needs to be understood.
But doing it all at once might be clouding what needs to be the main focus.
A rational approach would be to recognize that there are trillions of these viruses inside our bodies and on our bodies but when they get out of control and cause serious illness it is most often due to health problems of the infected individual. And the appearance of virulent pathogens likely means an imbalance has been created in the natural micro-organism environment, probably due to wonderful things like glyphosate that they dump into the food chain, billions of pounds/yr. That doesn't mean the virus doesn't exist or that it cannot cause disease. It just means that the cause of infectious illness is more complicated than just having an infection by a viral pathogen. Dr. Zach Bush writes a lot about that stuff:
Cole smirked when Malone said something about a really large viral load. My view is that Vanden Bossche's virus is us. I suspect Malone's is too. In which case Cole's smirk is well a little inappropriate. I will have a look at their interview later and maybe deconstruct it a little.
Koch’s postulates...not much to do with Lab created airborne bioweapon(s) = flying BatAIDS. Amazing Bats that can fly from Wuhan to Iran in 3 or 4 days and find the old holly men of Iran.
An obvious CIA job. They were foaming at the mouth, salivating at the thought of infecting Venezuelan leadership, but had to hold back because it would have been just too obvious.
I was lucky to be plugged into this community from the get go.
Anyone watching who hasn't been aware, please keep in mind that Cowan, Kaufman and Yi (I'm only recently aware of Bailey) have been speaking to this for over two years. So any levity or Joseph's attempts at humor, in the form of his edits, are very much needed for sanity's sake.
That any of them can exercise patience at this point is fairly unbelievable.
I think we should be very careful in not dismissing people's struggle with illness as we do not know and it won't help anyone open their mind to looking at things with a different understanding.
Maybe the last piece might have been in a separate video so as not to overwhelm someone new to this conversation.
It isn't new to me but it is always overwhelming.
I would add that changing perspective is difficult. There are organizations that are put into place to protect the public's safety. People should be able to trust these organizations. For many that is a monumental shift away from a long held belief system.
Bioweapons are not automatically "viruses." A bioweapon can be any number of things, it can be a naturally-occurring thing, like arsenic. These bioweapons labs are real, they exist, and nobody is denying that. Viruses, on the other hand, have never been proven to exist, at least, not in the capacity they have been said to employ. Viriology looks very much like a fairy tale, made up by pharmaceutical company employees who wanted to create a never-ending source of revenue: Vaccines. What if the human immune system is so amazingly protective and effective that vaccine makers have a hard time selling their product? Creating a fake "virus" or two might just do the trick, because most people have no idea about any of the science. This has been going on for a couple of decades or so... full-tilt... but it started back in the 1800's. It's always been about MONEY. That old saying, "Follow the Money" is a very good one. What's the best way to turn someone into a killer? Yep... Money.
Arsenic isn't a bioweapon, it's a chemical weapon. Follow the money = Banksters. Banksters own the CIA. The CIA is all about disinformation. No viruses, fake viruses sounds very much like CIA disinformation, kinda like their "lone gunman" theory or their "no planes" theory of 9/11. So they make vast sums of money doing whatever they want because they know they can mislead the public in ten different directions by spreading fake narratives like no virus nutball theories.
Miles is really an idiot, Amanda. I wouldn't call what he does scholarship as it's pure speculation with an agenda. So if you were looking for psyop well you can't go past him.
How is it you can understand the basic things, like CIA disinformation, and banksters, and stiill get everything wrong?
A "bioweapon" is a weapon that uses BIOLOGY. Arsenic is a biological toxin, in that it is not a man-made chemical like glyphosate. Do you understand the difference there? I was speaking to a layperson, who is vastly more courteous than you. This is not biology class, and yet, you act as if you know something about science. If that were the case, you'd be able to explain your position using SCIENCE, but all you can do, apparently, is insult me and use logical fallacies. I never said anything about 9/11 or airplanes, I never mentioned anything about "lone gunmen." You can't even stick to the topic YOU brought up. I think you're arguing above your pay grade, son. When you can explain virology to me, and why the virus theory is viable, then maybe you can earn some credit here.
No a bioweapon is biological agent usually a virus or bacterium but could be a bacterial toxin i.e. botulism. Arsenic is a chemical element and it does affect our biology like any chemical weapon, just like one of the most common chemical weapons = the element Chlorine.
And quit your whining, once again "playing the victim", a particularly disgusting behavior of your fellow woke neoliberals. As I stated, you are doing the dirty work of the CIA by promoting nutball theories that detract from the real issues of the Covid Plandemic. Join the people, not the Globalist Oligarchy.
For you information viruses that attack bacteria have been used for a century to treat infections, they are called phages. Very popular in Russia, and effective.
Also, and this is going to sound stupid, but did anyone see or confirm them all? They could have said there were 388 biolabs in the Ukraine and everyone would have gone, oh wow. Don't trust these bastards is what I am saying I guess.
Actually, it seems fairly clear that she did lie under oath... and not under oath, too. She's been well outed as a liar. She's such an embarrassment, she's been fired. By the Ukraine govt.
I'm not going to argue with you. When people are brainwashed, they are unable to think properly. But you'll notice that somewhere I also said that the biolabs do exist. When you've isolated a virus, let me know.
Unless the testimony before congress was Hollywood theatre too. Congress is a joke. They are all in on the scam. Hard to believe but think about it because it would explain a lot.
I don't get that impression. And his film looks worth the look as well. I think both Mark Bailey and Tom Cowan are also good, Mark being the one that bought most to the table in that interview. Likely more than his wife would have.
It is always possible for me to change my mind, I have over Malone & Kirsch for example. I won't on Geert though. And ALL CAPS substackers, well.
I havn't actually been on Kirsch's substack for several months, so can't really comment. Re the mRNA shots I think they do damage but this was known over a hundred years ago (other mammals blood, or blood product, does not play well with ours) and the lipids are just as damaging by the looks of it. Agree about Malone (supposedly) offering his arm up. Also in the video above I saw a smirk on Cole's face that I wouldn't mind helping him to adjust.
And re Geert, I'm not going to change my mind on him because I've always thought his idea of immune escape had holes in it a mile wide. But I've recently realized that his virus is us. So he makes more sense to me now.
If your intentions are good, and I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, then it's incumbent upon YOU to read, read, read, listen, listen, listen, to the OTHER side than you agree with. Because it's very easy to hear something that you want to believe and just... believe it. Cheers.
Yes, we are! And we're trained to snarl at people who disagree with us, and it's very, very prevalent, to the point that people have a hard time disagreeing about ANYTHING anymore. There's a hugely effective tool used by the Bad Guys: Divide and Conquer. You're allowed to have an opinion, and to suggest that other people read something, and so forth. Nothing wrong with that. Because regarding Covid has been a very powerful lesson in Divide and Conquer, we're all leery of people from "the other side" trying to argue this or that and wanting us to agree... I think it's good to explore a given idea or question. But being respectful and reasonable and calm goes a long way toward creating UNITY, which is what we need, big time! So, thank you, for inhabiting those things. Did you watch this video? I think it's very, very good. That's my opinion! ^_^
Has the video been taken down?
No, maybe it's geofenced.
It's a Rumble video that you can't embed directly into Substack. But if you click the graphic for it the link is still there and you should go directly to the video on Rumble.
Steve Kirsch just announced:
"...Is there a virus?.... I just now sent off an email to Christine Massey challenging her, Lanka, Kaufman, Bailey, etc. to a debate on whether COVID is a virus or not. She received the email and is conferring with her colleagues. Let’s see if they accept. That will be fun. I bet I can sell tickets to that one...."
Oh big surprise. Poor Steve.
He'll be flattened if he accepts his own invitation. By a steamroller. So I guess he's going to nix it somehow and blame the other side.
We will see. My bet is Kaufman and his sidekicks will refuse to debate.
I guess it depends on the conditions. Which have no doubt been manufactured to bring that result about.
Nope. Steve Kirsch has always offered the most generous conditions for the other side in his debate offers, like even giving his debate evidence and arguments well in advance to the other side so they will be free to put together their counter-argument. You are starting to backtrack already before they have even responded.
Dr. Paul Cottrell lambasts "no-virus" theories and shows actual pictures of the SARS-COV-2 virus:
Vodka Wars Ep29 (Absolute proof Dr. Ardis is WRONG. SARS-COV-2 photos) by Dr. Paul Cottrell
https://www.brighteon.com/c3bbc226-50e6-4792-8b85-c961f3c87add
Vodka Wars Ep12 (Bioweapon labs in Ukraine and the USA spin) by Dr. Paul Cottrell
https://www.brighteon.com/8ac13870-9268-4501-819c-472583d40de5
I have no time for Ardis, I doubt many of us do. But pictures are not proof of viruses either. Soz.
Strawman. Put one up and then demolish him. I wonder what the retirement package for Ardis is.
Pretty interesting that a bunch of posts have been deleted on this Substack by the same poster. I wouldn't mind knowing what bought that on.
Controlled opposition? Grifters? My bet is both.
https://99yearblues.substack.com/p/99-year-blues?s=w. Stegiel has a brand new bag.
After I heard Malone interviewed a few weeks ago and him saying (paraphrased), "I'd like to say a lot more about this (speaking about the "pandemic", "covid", etc) but I would lose my license", I lost all respect for him. There are hundreds of experts who have been willing to lose everything for this cause. Those are the ones I respect and am more likely to trust.
I have now listened to the video and want to re-listen because I missed stuff. How's them saying they can't isolate the virus because there isn't enough. What? We are the culture, as one doctor said. Why can't they find the virus in a human culture? So ridiculous. Malone just reverts to doctorese language to bamboozle but it doesn't mean shite.
What's your view on Jimmy Kimmel Amanda? Does he exist?
I think he is a dickhead and wished he didn't exist.
Was that the right answer? Is he a virus in this scenario?
Previous post disappeared. I don't think anyone's a virus but you're probably right about Kimmel being a dickhead.
I am curious why your Substack popped up on my account ?
Substack's algorithms must think you need this here blog, rita.
Yeah, you & Kaufman just volunteer to go to Africa and treat the tentfulls of dying Ebola patients without the usual moon suit, full body and breathing apparatus protection, and we'll see how long you last.
Reacting out of FEAR is exactly the desired response. Consider that. If you want to live in fear, that's your choice... and it IS a choice... But when living in fear is mandated, then you've given up your ability to choose. Are you sure you trust oligarchs, or very greedy pharma operatives, to make that choice for you? Whatever the Truth is, however upsetting, isn't it better to look at it, clear-eyed, than to simply cower on command?
Who's living in Fear? I'm just talking science. I trust the oligarchs and big pharma as much as I trust a pissed off black mamba. It seems to me that people pushing out crap like "there are no viruses" or "viruses don't cause disease" are useful idiots, doing the bidding of the oligarchs and big Pharma by the standard off-the-shelf CIA disinformation tactic called "Poisoning the Well". Next you'll be telling us Covid is caused by Alien moonbeams. Fits very well with the CIA narrative that all those who critique vaccines and covid draconian measures are crackpots and nutballs.
That's what I thought when I first looked into 'viruses don't exist'. I thought misdirection and blackwashing the anti-covid movement with crazy viruses don't exist freaks. But a lot of what they say sounded rational. So then I wondered if the truth was somewhere in the middle. It was only after hearing people that I respected entertain the idea and I listened to the video put up by Rich that I started considering it seriously. Viruses are a great way to scare the public into taking vaccines, no questions asked. $$ I don't know, just trying to keep an open mind.
Dr. Paul Cottrell lambasts "no-virus" theories and shows actual pictures of the SARS-COV-2 virus:
Vodka Wars Ep29 (Absolute proof Dr. Ardis is WRONG. SARS-COV-2 photos) by Dr. Paul Cottrell
https://www.brighteon.com/c3bbc226-50e6-4792-8b85-c961f3c87add
Vodka Wars Ep12 (Bioweapon labs in Ukraine and the USA spin) by Dr. Paul Cottrell
https://www.brighteon.com/8ac13870-9268-4501-819c-472583d40de5
The science fraud is on the Rockefeller side of this argument. You know the side that has built the world's most profitable industry via the oil industry. The Germ theory crowd which is made up of the malicious who no more believe in germ theory than I do and the stupid who refuse to have a closer look at their jail walls.
Rockefeller's own the CIA and I don't know what you refer to as "Germ theory". It's viruses and bacteria. Both can be pathogenic. In this case it is a viral pathogen. The CIA loves crackpot theories that misdirect the focus from the critical issues:
1) The plandemic was preplanned with a bioengineered virus
2) The plandemic response was a disaster, made zero sense, had zero logic and devastated the world economy to the tune of $30T while costing millions of lives
3) The Covid vaccines are largely ineffective and they don't save lives, they cost lives, at the very minimum 4 all-cause deaths for every covid death saved (and that's for the alpha to delta strains which is all they're good for)
4) All the vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, mask mandates, covid lockdowns worsened overall public health, so could only have nefarious purposes of public oppression & control
5) They deliberately blockaded the dozens of effective & inexpensive treatments that prevent almost 100% of covid deaths and hospitalizations. No vaccines needed. $trillions saved. Insanity or deviousness. Pick one.
6) They deliberately murdered many citizens with nonsensical forced vaccine injuries and by using Remdesivir & intubation on hospitalized covid patients
7) They illegally refused to investigate the SARS-CoV-2 virus as a weapon of mass murder, at the very least mass manslaughter or 3rd degree murder. And have done nothing to prevent further bioweapon development.
Those are the REAL ISSUES. Those are the ESSENTIAL ISSUES. Don't misdirect effort into tangents that are 100% GUARANTEED to go nowhere and 100% GUARANTEED to ONLY protect the guilty, the evil-doers. Smarten the Fuck up!!!
"Rockefeller's own the CIA" - evidence please. Happy if you provide it, just that you should if you're going to claim it.
1) Pure speculation.
2) Yes, doesn't help your case though.
3) ibid
4) ibid
5) Claims that ivermectin and hydroxochloriquine worked against a non existent virus during a non existent pandemic are claims that have yet to be put to the test.
6) see 2, 3, 4.
7) ibid
".....Smarten the Fuck up!!!"
I am smart enough thanks. I have you worked out for example.
Zackly.
Bollocks. Show me the science. You appear to be convinced only by someone telling you what to think, and insults and insinuations just don't cut it. Show me your "science." And what the hell are you talking about, "black mamba"?? Are you racist, too? WTF.
I can show you the science. You can't. You sound like a cardboard cutout woke neoliberal, CIA puppy. Projection much. "Black mamba" Racist? Jesus. Do you even know what a black mamba is?
Snake venom! 😁
I looked up "black mamba." Sorry, I never claimed to be a herpetologist-- I should have known, another distraction. You tell me you can show me the science, but you're not doing that. You have NO CLUE who or what I am. LOL You're funny. But utterly, completely, ridiculously, wrong.
Sounds like Hollywood theatre to me. Who knows if there even were tents full of Ebola patients. Are you beginning to see a theme here? They lie. They lie all the time. It is all to give the appearance of scary diseases and create fear so they can sell vaccines and sterilise people probably.
I know they lie, I know they lie all the time, but it ain't them talking about the tents full of Ebola patients. That's all well known long before the big Psyop. This has been going on for a long time in Africa and other tropical locations, not just Ebola but Marburg and other hemorrhagic viruses.
Psyops have been going on for a long time, way before covid. How do you know the tent stories are true? I have only seen movies about it.
Maybe they are true, but I bet they are exaggerated.
"You never let a serious crisis go to waste" or even a minor one. 👍👍
Not just in Africa. The theater moved to the West 2 years ago via China (albeit I don't think China is a unique source, it's a global game). I got suspended from Linkedin for laughing at people doing the same costume larking in Auckland.
Costume larking?
Dressing up as if they were about to play doctors in this movie.
https://vimeo.com/123586851
The Hamburg Syndrome - a film from 1979 about an epidemic outbreak and quarantine? They were just prepping us for the 'real' thing.
And all these false plagues over the past 20 years or so... and "vax" injuries... it's all about money and culling.
I prefer to figure they were warning us. But yes, how strange.
Time I did that history of the virus/germ theory post as if you have an overview on this the strangeness disappears.
Probably not long but it wouldn't be ebola damage. It would be the pushers of ebola damage. They mad bro.
Uh, No. The people who live there are well aware of Ebola's deadly infection risk. And they literally run away when they see an escaped Ebola patient. Son, you wouldn't last long in that environment believing pseudo-science as you do.
Hi, Rich. I'm here after Elizabeth shared this post of yours. I saw that video, too. I've been into Cowan and Kaufman for quite a while now, and NOT into the other three doctors for less time, but for a while, too.
I guess it's POSSIBLE that these guys, Malone, McCullough, et al, really BELIEVE what they're saying... Maybe they're like the Mass Formation victims, they THINK they're right. My intuitive sense of Malone is that he's a liar, a charlatan, and a self-serving con man seeking to avoid retaliation for his part in genocide. I can't explain that, really... it's intuitive. But I'll tell you this: I trust my intuition, and I don't trust Malone, not one bit-- my alarm bells were all going off the first time I ever heard him speak. McCullough impresses me as a kind of brainwashed tool of the MIC, but there's something about him, too, like he's hoping to escape blame. The other guy seemed like he wished he hadn't agreed to be there, and I've had no other experience of him.
We know doctors are under heavy duty pressure to tow the narrative line... It takes some serious cojones to stand up and speak out against this fraud. So it's bound to cause a LOT of problems for our medical community to risk their careers, and their LIVES, during this time.
All Cowan and Kaufman want is transparency. Open discussion, scientific debate and investigation. Trying to determine whether or not someone is genuine seems like a waste of time. (although looking at their track record and affiliates should speak loudly) There are a lot of pieces in play here when it comes to the debate of germ theory versus terrain theory. A lot that needs to be understood about what we consider viruses and what else could explain the diseases we ascribe to them. As many are bringing up here.
But this debate is separate from the question of this particular 'vaccine' (s). Yes if the use of it is based on the possibly faulty premise of disease that needs clarity.
But in this moment it is the 'vaccines' themselves that are of biggest issue. And the death and destruction they are causing.
Germ and terrain theory needs to be discussed.
The insanity of the agenda as to the why of this needs to be understood.
But doing it all at once might be clouding what needs to be the main focus.
A rational approach would be to recognize that there are trillions of these viruses inside our bodies and on our bodies but when they get out of control and cause serious illness it is most often due to health problems of the infected individual. And the appearance of virulent pathogens likely means an imbalance has been created in the natural micro-organism environment, probably due to wonderful things like glyphosate that they dump into the food chain, billions of pounds/yr. That doesn't mean the virus doesn't exist or that it cannot cause disease. It just means that the cause of infectious illness is more complicated than just having an infection by a viral pathogen. Dr. Zach Bush writes a lot about that stuff:
https://zachbushmd.com/
Thank you for this!!!
Yeah I love Zach Bush too, was following his work for a awhile.
Not that it makes a difference but the phrase is "toe" the line. The genus is the reference to a start/finish line and to refrain from crossing it.
Just a little trivia to start your day....
I knew that, I actually caught myself somewhere (obviously not here) and fixed it... ;)
But pulling a line makes more sense!
Cole smirked when Malone said something about a really large viral load. My view is that Vanden Bossche's virus is us. I suspect Malone's is too. In which case Cole's smirk is well a little inappropriate. I will have a look at their interview later and maybe deconstruct it a little.
Let me know what you think. ^_^
Koch’s postulates...not much to do with Lab created airborne bioweapon(s) = flying BatAIDS. Amazing Bats that can fly from Wuhan to Iran in 3 or 4 days and find the old holly men of Iran.
An obvious CIA job. They were foaming at the mouth, salivating at the thought of infecting Venezuelan leadership, but had to hold back because it would have been just too obvious.
lol
Thank you so much for posting this video Rich!
I was lucky to be plugged into this community from the get go.
Anyone watching who hasn't been aware, please keep in mind that Cowan, Kaufman and Yi (I'm only recently aware of Bailey) have been speaking to this for over two years. So any levity or Joseph's attempts at humor, in the form of his edits, are very much needed for sanity's sake.
That any of them can exercise patience at this point is fairly unbelievable.
I think we should be very careful in not dismissing people's struggle with illness as we do not know and it won't help anyone open their mind to looking at things with a different understanding.
Maybe the last piece might have been in a separate video so as not to overwhelm someone new to this conversation.
It isn't new to me but it is always overwhelming.
I would add that changing perspective is difficult. There are organizations that are put into place to protect the public's safety. People should be able to trust these organizations. For many that is a monumental shift away from a long held belief system.
Bioweapons are not automatically "viruses." A bioweapon can be any number of things, it can be a naturally-occurring thing, like arsenic. These bioweapons labs are real, they exist, and nobody is denying that. Viruses, on the other hand, have never been proven to exist, at least, not in the capacity they have been said to employ. Viriology looks very much like a fairy tale, made up by pharmaceutical company employees who wanted to create a never-ending source of revenue: Vaccines. What if the human immune system is so amazingly protective and effective that vaccine makers have a hard time selling their product? Creating a fake "virus" or two might just do the trick, because most people have no idea about any of the science. This has been going on for a couple of decades or so... full-tilt... but it started back in the 1800's. It's always been about MONEY. That old saying, "Follow the Money" is a very good one. What's the best way to turn someone into a killer? Yep... Money.
Nice summary by the way.
Just should add here for context, the post that this is a reply to was not deleted by me.
OK... ?? One of your posts?
No it's Pandelis (sp?) who has been on a delete spree it seems.
Oh, yes. Yes, it was that person.
Arsenic isn't a bioweapon, it's a chemical weapon. Follow the money = Banksters. Banksters own the CIA. The CIA is all about disinformation. No viruses, fake viruses sounds very much like CIA disinformation, kinda like their "lone gunman" theory or their "no planes" theory of 9/11. So they make vast sums of money doing whatever they want because they know they can mislead the public in ten different directions by spreading fake narratives like no virus nutball theories.
Do you read Miles Mathis's papers?
Miles is really an idiot, Amanda. I wouldn't call what he does scholarship as it's pure speculation with an agenda. So if you were looking for psyop well you can't go past him.
I respectfully disagree.
Honeytrap?
How is it you can understand the basic things, like CIA disinformation, and banksters, and stiill get everything wrong?
A "bioweapon" is a weapon that uses BIOLOGY. Arsenic is a biological toxin, in that it is not a man-made chemical like glyphosate. Do you understand the difference there? I was speaking to a layperson, who is vastly more courteous than you. This is not biology class, and yet, you act as if you know something about science. If that were the case, you'd be able to explain your position using SCIENCE, but all you can do, apparently, is insult me and use logical fallacies. I never said anything about 9/11 or airplanes, I never mentioned anything about "lone gunmen." You can't even stick to the topic YOU brought up. I think you're arguing above your pay grade, son. When you can explain virology to me, and why the virus theory is viable, then maybe you can earn some credit here.
No a bioweapon is biological agent usually a virus or bacterium but could be a bacterial toxin i.e. botulism. Arsenic is a chemical element and it does affect our biology like any chemical weapon, just like one of the most common chemical weapons = the element Chlorine.
And quit your whining, once again "playing the victim", a particularly disgusting behavior of your fellow woke neoliberals. As I stated, you are doing the dirty work of the CIA by promoting nutball theories that detract from the real issues of the Covid Plandemic. Join the people, not the Globalist Oligarchy.
For you information viruses that attack bacteria have been used for a century to treat infections, they are called phages. Very popular in Russia, and effective.
https://www.healthline.com/health/phage-therapy
How can a bacteriophage also be a virus? Have bacteriophages been isolated?
By the way, I wish people would stop being so sensitive.
LOLOLOLOL You should go on the stage.
Also, and this is going to sound stupid, but did anyone see or confirm them all? They could have said there were 388 biolabs in the Ukraine and everyone would have gone, oh wow. Don't trust these bastards is what I am saying I guess.
The biolabs are part of the nastiness... They're real.
Fair question. To my knowledge not a single Ukrainian biolab has ever been isolated.
US Department of Defense Finally Comes Clean – Admits in Public Document that There Are 46 US Military-Funded Biolabs in Ukraine:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/us-department-defense-finally-comes-clean-admits-public-document-46-us-funded-biolabs-ukraine/
Hey hey! Congrats. And that's just in Ukraine...
That was funny.
Actually, it seems fairly clear that she did lie under oath... and not under oath, too. She's been well outed as a liar. She's such an embarrassment, she's been fired. By the Ukraine govt.
I'm not going to argue with you. When people are brainwashed, they are unable to think properly. But you'll notice that somewhere I also said that the biolabs do exist. When you've isolated a virus, let me know.
A leftist can be untruthful under oath and not fear repercussions
A lot of this stuff is just theatre. The gov and alphabet agencies don't work for the people. Just look who they put in charge. Total incompetence.
Unless the testimony before congress was Hollywood theatre too. Congress is a joke. They are all in on the scam. Hard to believe but think about it because it would explain a lot.
unless nuland lied. LOL.
I hadn't really considered the possibility until Alex mentioned it. But I certainly am now.
Jabs I guess, chemical weapons. Or overrated bio warfare.
No chemical weapons are low grade. It's all about bioweapons now.
lol *face palm*
Rense I give a wide berth to. Have you watched the video in my post?
Dr Chetty I've seen that one several months ago. He seemed pretty on to it.
And as I said, probably due to time constraints (hmm sleep...) I'll likely give the amyloidosis a miss.
What do you have against Kaufman?
I don't get that impression. And his film looks worth the look as well. I think both Mark Bailey and Tom Cowan are also good, Mark being the one that bought most to the table in that interview. Likely more than his wife would have.
It is always possible for me to change my mind, I have over Malone & Kirsch for example. I won't on Geert though. And ALL CAPS substackers, well.
I havn't actually been on Kirsch's substack for several months, so can't really comment. Re the mRNA shots I think they do damage but this was known over a hundred years ago (other mammals blood, or blood product, does not play well with ours) and the lipids are just as damaging by the looks of it. Agree about Malone (supposedly) offering his arm up. Also in the video above I saw a smirk on Cole's face that I wouldn't mind helping him to adjust.
I might have a quick look at your links tomorrow.
And re Geert, I'm not going to change my mind on him because I've always thought his idea of immune escape had holes in it a mile wide. But I've recently realized that his virus is us. So he makes more sense to me now.
Uh huh.
Which has more substance do you think, your post or mine (uh huh)? Or are they equal in having none whatsoever?
I'll probably pass on that one.....
I'll pass on that one too tbh. Dr Diagnosis. I'm fine here.
If your intentions are good, and I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, then it's incumbent upon YOU to read, read, read, listen, listen, listen, to the OTHER side than you agree with. Because it's very easy to hear something that you want to believe and just... believe it. Cheers.
Yes, we are! And we're trained to snarl at people who disagree with us, and it's very, very prevalent, to the point that people have a hard time disagreeing about ANYTHING anymore. There's a hugely effective tool used by the Bad Guys: Divide and Conquer. You're allowed to have an opinion, and to suggest that other people read something, and so forth. Nothing wrong with that. Because regarding Covid has been a very powerful lesson in Divide and Conquer, we're all leery of people from "the other side" trying to argue this or that and wanting us to agree... I think it's good to explore a given idea or question. But being respectful and reasonable and calm goes a long way toward creating UNITY, which is what we need, big time! So, thank you, for inhabiting those things. Did you watch this video? I think it's very, very good. That's my opinion! ^_^