Aug 2, 2023·edited Aug 2, 2023Liked by Richard Seager
Banning by misinformers seems to have become more and more common. I also bumped into this event and was wondering who had been banned and why. Thank you for the details; they speak for themselves.
2nd has become worse and worse and (s)he is now selling "Ivermectin," for better or worse:
On May 6, 2023, my one-year anniversary, I issued "amnesty" to the four trolls/morons/bots that had disrupted the comment sections on my stack. Since then, I had to ban another person and ask one more to leave, as you put it, "on good terms," because the guy was taking over comments with topics that either didn't pertain to the articles or cannot be conclusively discussed, resulting in a waste of my time and energy as well as serving as a distraction for my readers.
I am also banned by Frances Leader (the self-proclaimed "with" who blames Jesuits for stuff that happened 100 years before the Jesuit order was founded :) ). I also banned her after her diatribe for my publishing her rude and disrespectful response to a fair question, which I included in my following article (but issued amnesty later):
I pose questions but not much attention is paid. I am tired of asking "experts" why mod-dna is not mRNA and why no spike protein is found? Other questions arise but also go unanswered. Such as insulin under the darkfield microscope showing self assembling structures. am I to think therefore all insulin is this way, no answer. Frances banned me then a few weeks later unbanned.
War. Weird eh. I am lucky. No one cares to pester me. :). My mockery won't fade away.
Banning by misinformers seems to have become more and more common. I also bumped into this event and was wondering who had been banned and why. Thank you for the details; they speak for themselves.
2nd has become worse and worse and (s)he is now selling "Ivermectin," for better or worse:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/further-considerations-about-ivermectin
On May 6, 2023, my one-year anniversary, I issued "amnesty" to the four trolls/morons/bots that had disrupted the comment sections on my stack. Since then, I had to ban another person and ask one more to leave, as you put it, "on good terms," because the guy was taking over comments with topics that either didn't pertain to the articles or cannot be conclusively discussed, resulting in a waste of my time and energy as well as serving as a distraction for my readers.
In my early days, I was banned by "Eugyppius":
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/on-eugippius
I am also banned by Frances Leader (the self-proclaimed "with" who blames Jesuits for stuff that happened 100 years before the Jesuit order was founded :) ). I also banned her after her diatribe for my publishing her rude and disrespectful response to a fair question, which I included in my following article (but issued amnesty later):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/is-healing-a-myth-altogether
Another inconsequential misinformer also banned me, but I forget the name. :)
Kirsch banned Proton Magic recently:
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/steve-kirsch-substack-banned-me-for
I am still pulling 2nd's leg, waiting to be banned, too. I won't lose anything, if that happens.
I pose questions but not much attention is paid. I am tired of asking "experts" why mod-dna is not mRNA and why no spike protein is found? Other questions arise but also go unanswered. Such as insulin under the darkfield microscope showing self assembling structures. am I to think therefore all insulin is this way, no answer. Frances banned me then a few weeks later unbanned.
I unsubscribed to the seconded one a while back.
What a bore I am. No one has ever offered to ban me.
*Must try harder. Has potential*. Huh my old school reports.
Still writing my lines.
There’s a ban button?
So, an on the target comment it seems