I am surprised. Chile and a few others have used Sinovax, He knew that.
Berenson has served his usefulness. His main selling - literally - point was that he pointed to the obvious on mask, lockdowns and vaccs to a wider audience. Now that no one can rationally deny their own eyes, he has lost his main purpose.
I remember he, looking at their data, said J&J had a better safety profile.
He is a class study of the need to be switched on and verify everything!
Feb 17, 2022·edited Feb 17, 2022Liked by Richard Seager
I really like your articles, so I respect your interpretation. However, I didn't really read it as his "pushing" this vaccine in particular. The essence of the comparison is that this vaccine (coincidentally made in China) was created in the "old" way, basically injecting an impotent but whole virus to create an immune response, just like every vaccine we have already with the exception of maybe two "vector" vaccines I've read about developed by Novavax (one each for whooping cough and one type of hepatitis). So the vaccine's important quality is not that it's Chinese. That's immaterial. The important quality is that being the "whole" virus, versus just the spikes or something to make our cells make the spikes, it may not create the antibody storm, but it creates greater t-cell memory and thereby offers longer protection.
Now, we can disagree about trusting Chinese research (I actually find it laughable that anybody would believe their research, but I feel the same about believing any research coming out of a multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical company).
However, our "betters" here in the US, which is Berenson's main audience as he is American as are most of his readers, have told us that we can trust research coming out of China. In fact, we must treat it as sacred and unquestionable.
This is my conclusion, more than Berenson's, but our "betters" here cannot have it both ways. Either the Chinese are telling the truth and their old-fashioned vaccine is working better than our shiny new mRNA/AAV vaccines OR China is lying about the efficacy of this vaccine (and by implication much more). Either way, China wants nothing to do with the mRNA/AAV vaccines that have been created outside China, which could be from many reasons, the least being protection of their citizens, and our country won't okay their "old-fashioned" vaccine. But the US won't okay the Novavax vaccine, which is just the spikes and not the mRNA/AAV technology regardless of its use elsewhere, particularly in Europe, and regardless of the fact that Novavax is a wholly American company and relatively old and well established.
In other words, it's just another layer of ridiculousness that shows the widespread corruption and misuse of this "pandemic" we're seeing here in the US.
Feb 17, 2022·edited Feb 17, 2022Liked by Richard Seager
no ‘vaccines’ for me... they’ve ALL lost my trust... thankful i got red-pilled on Malone as well (lionessofjudahministry.substack guest 2/12/21 post by Diana West is a MUST READ) as he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing looking to capitalize with his own upcoming ‘safe’ version of the MRNA vax & preserve his reputation. so, dear ungovernable rich, please consider withdrawing your support of this guy.
Wow, I've been out of the loop for a few weeks with Substack and news because of things happening in my life.
Thanks for the heads up, I guess everyone has a buying price, and it seems Alex may have just sold out. No less to the Chinese of all obvious candidates. What a shame...
He's a dummy that believes there was some deadly virus when 2020 showed there was no higher overall mortality.
https://thesecularheretic.com/terrain-theory-recontextualising-the-germ/
Ugh
Rich, how do you like the new "give gift" nudge unit option?
I am okay with it as freeloading is too easy, but it is a bit in my face, and a distraction from what I was already thinking about.
Maybe I will become oblivious to it, but why am I getting that message when I have paid for this month with Plebeian Resistance?
Might need some fine tuning.
The "vaccine" is just a delivery mechanism.
No end to the possible inclusions.
I am surprised. Chile and a few others have used Sinovax, He knew that.
Berenson has served his usefulness. His main selling - literally - point was that he pointed to the obvious on mask, lockdowns and vaccs to a wider audience. Now that no one can rationally deny their own eyes, he has lost his main purpose.
I remember he, looking at their data, said J&J had a better safety profile.
He is a class study of the need to be switched on and verify everything!
I really like your articles, so I respect your interpretation. However, I didn't really read it as his "pushing" this vaccine in particular. The essence of the comparison is that this vaccine (coincidentally made in China) was created in the "old" way, basically injecting an impotent but whole virus to create an immune response, just like every vaccine we have already with the exception of maybe two "vector" vaccines I've read about developed by Novavax (one each for whooping cough and one type of hepatitis). So the vaccine's important quality is not that it's Chinese. That's immaterial. The important quality is that being the "whole" virus, versus just the spikes or something to make our cells make the spikes, it may not create the antibody storm, but it creates greater t-cell memory and thereby offers longer protection.
Now, we can disagree about trusting Chinese research (I actually find it laughable that anybody would believe their research, but I feel the same about believing any research coming out of a multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical company).
However, our "betters" here in the US, which is Berenson's main audience as he is American as are most of his readers, have told us that we can trust research coming out of China. In fact, we must treat it as sacred and unquestionable.
This is my conclusion, more than Berenson's, but our "betters" here cannot have it both ways. Either the Chinese are telling the truth and their old-fashioned vaccine is working better than our shiny new mRNA/AAV vaccines OR China is lying about the efficacy of this vaccine (and by implication much more). Either way, China wants nothing to do with the mRNA/AAV vaccines that have been created outside China, which could be from many reasons, the least being protection of their citizens, and our country won't okay their "old-fashioned" vaccine. But the US won't okay the Novavax vaccine, which is just the spikes and not the mRNA/AAV technology regardless of its use elsewhere, particularly in Europe, and regardless of the fact that Novavax is a wholly American company and relatively old and well established.
In other words, it's just another layer of ridiculousness that shows the widespread corruption and misuse of this "pandemic" we're seeing here in the US.
no ‘vaccines’ for me... they’ve ALL lost my trust... thankful i got red-pilled on Malone as well (lionessofjudahministry.substack guest 2/12/21 post by Diana West is a MUST READ) as he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing looking to capitalize with his own upcoming ‘safe’ version of the MRNA vax & preserve his reputation. so, dear ungovernable rich, please consider withdrawing your support of this guy.
Is the study flawed in a way Alex didn't uncover? Otherwise, his article looks reasonable and logical. Specifically, what's wrong with it?
Wow, I've been out of the loop for a few weeks with Substack and news because of things happening in my life.
Thanks for the heads up, I guess everyone has a buying price, and it seems Alex may have just sold out. No less to the Chinese of all obvious candidates. What a shame...
Alas do all dance to Chinese tunes?