38 Comments
Jun 13, 2023·edited Jun 13, 2023Liked by Richard Seager

Glenn Greenwald has advised me that he is no longer on Substack. He's on "Locals".

Expand full comment

One thing I find interesting is that none of the establishment alternative media figures will mention voting systems at all. Ever. I've begged all of them to do it, and God knows they often seem pretty desperate to scrape together the daily content so you would think. But no. rangevoting.org might make some actual difference beyond rage and clicks

Expand full comment
author

We've basically got range voting in Dunedin & Australia. It too is a con.

Expand full comment

No you have ranked, which is entirely different. Ranked ends up leaving the two party duopoly unchallenged, range doesn't. I think this is why ranked has so much establishment support. The differences weren't at all obvious to me either but if you poke around on rangevoting.org there are great explanations there

Expand full comment
author

Ok thanks. Will have a look.

Expand full comment
author

Basically the chances of a unexpected candidate is reduced substantially as the establishment candidates all vote for themselves.

Expand full comment

No I don't make any money on Substack and I write for it every day. Religiously you might say.

I enjoy it though, actually using my brain, thinking that I am amusing and having conversations about things that I have no one else to talk with about.

It helps with the extreme loneliness of these times.

Expand full comment
author

You are pretty amusing Cairn.

Expand full comment

LOL yourself!

Expand full comment

My husband wrote a novel but can't get anyone to read it.

Expand full comment
author

What's it about?

Expand full comment

It's like what you write about.

A whodunit

Expand full comment
author

Maybe we need the "Jacinda Ardern, her life" unauthorized version.

Expand full comment
Jun 12, 2023·edited Jun 12, 2023Liked by Richard Seager

Sub$tack was made to make money for the company ( not writers and publishers)and use the content writing "AI" bot to control the existing narrative (and the c. op narrative) .

Its the age of dis information and people are still addicted to the narrative ( and fear)

I imagine all the controlled op (CIA-mo-sad) dis-info content writers can have laundered subscriber number$ and with it the already inflated fake value of Substack goes up .

Expand full comment
author

I think you should give the British some credit there along with the Americans and Israelis.. They're still very influential.

Expand full comment
author

The Pakastanis as well. From what I've read they're basically a mini me of the British MI6

Expand full comment

ATD . I see it as the one eye(CIA, MOSSAD KGB etc) the central banksters intel org is not nationalized though that is what they want you to believe in all the CIA porn( mind programming) that they release through hellywood.

Expand full comment
author

Yes my view is that any organization along these lines means that you're not a democracy.

Expand full comment
Jun 14, 2023Liked by Richard Seager

Yes. My view is when the economic monopoly ( central bankster$) choose and run their candidates (not us) and then whole election process is just a media clown show process ...then we are just told by the govt( that always gets in) who is their PM. Not our PM. " He who counts the votes counts" GC. Noticed they are running a "voting survey" to find out how many are disenfranchised. Their solution to having minority is to get children voting.

Those in govt don't see ( as they are nuts)govt action's( central bankster policies) read like an undeclared war on the people.

We were just locked up (healthy ) home detained and we committed no crime, then we were forced into a medical experiment . Insanity is what is going on, the govts actions are those of a criminal lunatic. If any of you have had a disagreement with govt you'll know dealing with them is impossible, they ignore facts, lie and speak in gobbledygook.

Expand full comment

I make $00.00 as a writer here. In 1999 I was writing for a site called Themestream. Different payment structure. We were paid per view not subscribers. After being on Themestream for the same amount of time I’ve been on SS I was making almost $900 a week and we were paid every Friday. No digital deposit bs. A check in your mailbox. I don’t ask for money nor do I seek out subscribers anymore.

Expand full comment
author
Jun 13, 2023·edited Jun 13, 2023Author

I went had had a look at Themestream. Seems to me a platform that the MSM would want to take down if you could turn over that much. I mean it's not a huge amount but it's better than $3.50 a week.

I think we all realize we're not going to make any money on Substack. I tried last year to leverage my post on the WEF YGLs which has had 50k views (far more than any other post of mine) but it was to no avail whatsoever. Robert Malone then went and tried to claim it as his own.

Expand full comment

Themestream folded right after the assholes knocked down buildings in New York and then took us to war. If you put a Dr. in front of your first name it helps a lot. I don’t know how some of them can call themselves doctors. I can’t understand why anyone would want them to lead us out of this when it was their job to stop this before they launched the vaxx. I think it’s Malone who attaches a UPGRADE TO PAID after every paragraph. Insane. Also I was informed superstar doc Michael Yeadon who recently challenged Malone (probably a fake challenge) won’t even allow you to read unless you pay. Malone was the same way until I wrote a piece on him then he changed. One doc told me she thinks it was my post. Don’t know but timing was right. That’s why I think it’s easier to just write in the war, forget money, forget subscribers and just let them money whore it all. Dr. Profitoffagenocides

Expand full comment
author

I still like Michael Yeadon but he has been a bit reserved in his interactions with me on occasion which gives me some pause. But I'm still giving him the benefit of the doubt. Malone jumps into his comments with trolls on occasion, I did like him initially but his behaviour put an end to that. Along with his consistent cowtowing to the vaccine establishment over decades.

Expand full comment

I’d like Yeadon to explain his public challenge to Malone rather than just call him on the phone and talk. It doesn’t make sense.

Expand full comment
author

I havn't seen anything about it. Been preoccupied elsewhere.

Expand full comment