The inevitable response (I'm banned from Frances Leader's substack for a '100 years').
I'm sure that Substack suspects, or knows, what I also know. That Frances is a professional troll (i.e. she gets paid for it). A Russian one is a possibility.
Now if Frances, SageHana, Elizabeth, Lilli Chilli* and all the rest of this crowd want to leave me alone, then I'm happy to reciprocate. Otherwise I'll assume that they're malicious.
And female online well both of SageHana and Frances Leader have not impressed me as female on occasion. It is quite easy to pass on log-in details to your aggressive male friend. As here for example;
And being called c&nt by SageHana 30 times or so for the crime of criticising Geert Van Den Bossche for, amongst otther things, his work with the Gates Foundation. Before that there was no, or very little (a couple of posts in February), interaction between myself and SageHana.
And who is to say that SageHana is not the same person as this guy;
After all the person that it belongs to, Nate Klingenstein, is Sage Hana's first follower on Substack (with Amy Sukwan pretty quickly afterwards)
Libel, harassment, bullying and threats is what this is. It has, as others have mentioned, the hallmarks of something like Brigade 77.
* I've posted once to Lilli Chilli and that was that her photo was the same as Amy Sukwan's and that therefore they appear to be the same person (Amy Sukwan being very close to SageHana). And for that I am targeted on her blog for the posts of Slandermen (one assumes, he doesn't actually get a mention) whom I've had to ban many times from my blog.
Troll elsewhere Frank. I appealed your suspension, mainly for consistency reasons as free speech denied in one place is free speech denied everywhere (to paraphrase) but SS got back to me that they didn't care for you too much. Consequently you being here right now is not doing my blog any favours. Plus you have enemies who want my substack gone so all you're doing is enabling them. Which is odd behaviour for someone who professes to be on the same side.
no, it was directed at this comment to me, perhaps the person direct messaged me...but to share, ..from a 'sir isO' replied to your (my) comment
"Mark Crispin Miller and Mathew Crawford are kinda both souled out, just in case you didn't know." to which I replied 'You are hilarious and without soul.'
I generally agree with CairnTerrier about the teeth. Wish the first pic could be cleaned up some to see if the raised moles were visible. There's a different angle between the pix that could possibly explain the teeth. The moles would chinch it for me.
Comments only available to paid subscribers on this one. But as I gave out a lot of subscriptions a while ago free of charge that includes quite a few of you.
Sorry for those who would like to comment but can't due to this but I have had to put up with a little too much from 'bad actors' over the last few months in my comments section so that's the reason.
It's not a crime to have a nom de plume, I guess it's the extent of the deception. Creating a whole fake persona, conning us perhaps.
I know that my name is not Cairn and I don't expect anyone to think that it is, but if I went on about Cairn this or that with photos purporting to be Cairn, and having a Cairn family; then I should be called out on that.
What would be the motive for all the extra acting.
The inevitable response (I'm banned from Frances Leader's substack for a '100 years').
I'm sure that Substack suspects, or knows, what I also know. That Frances is a professional troll (i.e. she gets paid for it). A Russian one is a possibility.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/substack-support-this-must-be-stopped
The first commentator to it, Phil Durling, only follows one substacker and that substacker is Frances.
Who is stalking whom, I'd ask?
Is this stalking?
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/the-curious-story-of-not-a-virus
and
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/dunedin-city-council-elections-early
Now if Frances, SageHana, Elizabeth, Lilli Chilli* and all the rest of this crowd want to leave me alone, then I'm happy to reciprocate. Otherwise I'll assume that they're malicious.
And female online well both of SageHana and Frances Leader have not impressed me as female on occasion. It is quite easy to pass on log-in details to your aggressive male friend. As here for example;
https://plebeianresistance.substack.com/p/sometimes-one-needs-to-keep-things
And being called c&nt by SageHana 30 times or so for the crime of criticising Geert Van Den Bossche for, amongst otther things, his work with the Gates Foundation. Before that there was no, or very little (a couple of posts in February), interaction between myself and SageHana.
And who is to say that SageHana is not the same person as this guy;
https://seekingalpha.com/user/49665538/comments (the original handle was SilentSage but is now SilentRage)
After all the person that it belongs to, Nate Klingenstein, is Sage Hana's first follower on Substack (with Amy Sukwan pretty quickly afterwards)
Libel, harassment, bullying and threats is what this is. It has, as others have mentioned, the hallmarks of something like Brigade 77.
* I've posted once to Lilli Chilli and that was that her photo was the same as Amy Sukwan's and that therefore they appear to be the same person (Amy Sukwan being very close to SageHana). And for that I am targeted on her blog for the posts of Slandermen (one assumes, he doesn't actually get a mention) whom I've had to ban many times from my blog.
https://lilychili.substack.com/p/hello
Troll elsewhere Frank. I appealed your suspension, mainly for consistency reasons as free speech denied in one place is free speech denied everywhere (to paraphrase) but SS got back to me that they didn't care for you too much. Consequently you being here right now is not doing my blog any favours. Plus you have enemies who want my substack gone so all you're doing is enabling them. Which is odd behaviour for someone who professes to be on the same side.
I think you're phishing.
"Sorry, an error occurred" is the message I get when I try and ban you. So who's playing with the substack javascript?
You are hilarious and without soul.
Who's that directed at?
If me, well at least we can agree on Eric T I guess.
no, it was directed at this comment to me, perhaps the person direct messaged me...but to share, ..from a 'sir isO' replied to your (my) comment
"Mark Crispin Miller and Mathew Crawford are kinda both souled out, just in case you didn't know." to which I replied 'You are hilarious and without soul.'
I thought it might have been. But when I banned sir IsO (for a minute) I accidentally removed all of his posts. So I couldn't see the context.
Dude, no, that is 2 diff people. Whoa. Way off base man.
Next up is Lili Chilli and Amy Sukwan.
Generally the same face, but teeth not so good on older face.
One could say that about me too unfortunately.
And me. I noticed that too, I have to say. But of course they can be fixed.
I generally agree with CairnTerrier about the teeth. Wish the first pic could be cleaned up some to see if the raised moles were visible. There's a different angle between the pix that could possibly explain the teeth. The moles would chinch it for me.
Is it older face or older image.
Can be fixed in the face, or in the photo.
Video might be instructive. The teeth don't seem so straight nor so white.
Sorry, don't want to look any more.
Comments only available to paid subscribers on this one. But as I gave out a lot of subscriptions a while ago free of charge that includes quite a few of you.
Sorry for those who would like to comment but can't due to this but I have had to put up with a little too much from 'bad actors' over the last few months in my comments section so that's the reason.
It's not a crime to have a nom de plume, I guess it's the extent of the deception. Creating a whole fake persona, conning us perhaps.
I know that my name is not Cairn and I don't expect anyone to think that it is, but if I went on about Cairn this or that with photos purporting to be Cairn, and having a Cairn family; then I should be called out on that.
What would be the motive for all the extra acting.
both could be nom de plumes