22 Comments
Nov 29, 2021Liked by Richard Seager

Thanks for posting Rich. Very informative.

Expand full comment
author

It is. It's also the time for games so I cannot rule out that some are being played here. But we have to rely on the information and not the source as relying on the second is causing far too many problems in this world (i.e. in Universities all over the West).

So is his chemistry correct? That's the only thing that matters.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2021Liked by Richard Seager

He was incredibly brave, imagine knowing what he knew, he couldn't hold it within. Razor blades cutting your vessels, non biodegradable. God rest his soul.

Expand full comment
author

I wonder what can get rid of this material. NAC is what I thought might deal to it.

Expand full comment

NAC?

Expand full comment
Nov 30, 2021Liked by Richard Seager

N-Acetylcysteine

Expand full comment

mRNA most certainly is an issue. Nothing says there can't be multiple issues.

Expand full comment
author

This is Stefan Lanka on it;

"According to the prevailing theory, the messenger RNA injected with the vaccine triggers an immune system response that produces antibodies, and immunity is achieved within 3-6 months. This is the theory, but the reality is that it is not the mRNA that triggers the body's so-called immune reaction - i.e. the generation of antibodies - but the nanoparticles."

From here (it's a pdf)

https://alternativeprinciplesforhealth.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Stefan-Lanka-DSalud-Nu%CC%81mero-249-English-3-of-3.pdf

Expand full comment

Had to google. So per Lanka, measles is a psychosomatic disease. Funny. I had measles as a kid. 12 years ago had my antibody titers tested for a job. Still effective levels, no need for measles vax.

Expand full comment
author

I've never seen him say that it was psychosomatic. He does say that it's not caused by a virus.

Expand full comment

That is not the "prevailing theory." mRNA does not stimulate antibodies. mRNA contains recipes for proteins. The artificial mRNA feeds into cellular ribosomes to synthesize the spike proteins, which then stimulate antibodies. And it does not take 3-6 months to produce antibodies. Antibody production peaks at about 3 weeks, then levels off. That is why they allow a 2-4 week lag between jabs, to boost the titers to a supposedly more effective level.

3-6 months is when these so-called vaxes wear off, ie antibody titers drop to ineffective levels.

The prevailing question is "when does the artificial mRNA" dissipate?" The body eliminates natural mRNA within 48 hours. Natural mRNA is known to cause generalized inflammation. Artificial mRNA does the same re inflammation but modifications were made to make it stable for production & distribution, and those modifications make it last for an unknown amount of time.

It seems very possible that the mRNA is lasting 3-6 months, producing toxic spikes for that time, before the body is able to flush it all.

Expand full comment
author

Yep the mRNA was supposedly coated in a lipid that gave it longer lasting properties re sticking around in the body and supposedly help in attaching to the cells. And;

* 3-6 months is roughly the amount of time that we have in regards to analysing this 'vaccine' as before that its spread was very limited.

* billions of years of evolution obviously decided that mRNA should not hang around for so long.

* There are some views that longer stays = modification of DNA

* Terrain theory does not posit that it causes inflammation, it posits that it cleans it up.

Expand full comment

The lipid envelop was only one modification made to stabilize. There were other modifications made to stabilize.

Expand full comment
author

I would have thought that any attempt to stabilize the mRNA itself would require the modification of our own systems to do so. As it is our system that eventually evacuates the mRNA not the mRNA itself.

Expand full comment
author

Israel being the outlier regarding when this vaccine was introduced. The State of Israel has a joint agreement with Pfizer regarding sharing of the results of this experiment and they're also the most generous of countries paying maybe 3 times what any other country is paying for this poison.

Both Netanyahu and Bennett deserve war crimes prosecutions for this.

Expand full comment

Should read "stimulates antibody production" for better clarity.

Expand full comment
author

And then;

"The body produces globulin to repair and rebuild tissues, nerves and blood vessels damaged by the nanoparticles and this is misinterpreted as the body's immune response. The tiny globules flatten and intertwine in the affected area and create new tissue to repair the damage; they are proteins that repair and rebuild tissue."

I'm still not ruling out mRNA shenanigans but I prefer these answers.

Expand full comment

You can prefer whatever answers you like, but I choose to follow leading virologists, immunologists, epidemiologists, & researchers, plus my own training as a med lab tech.

Expand full comment
author

I don't. I will just follow the evidence. There is not one virus that has been isolated. Ergo there is no such thing as a virus.

Expand full comment

Numerous labs atound the world have sequenced the entire genome, including variants. Not possible without isolating the virus.

Expand full comment
author

Well then they're sequencing and isolating Greek letters.

Expand full comment
author

There is a video online where Lanka talks about his training that confirms the standard line of viruses, that they exist. And then a friend suggesting to him that they don't and that he was surprised to reach this conclusion as well on investigation.

Germ vs Terrain theory was a big deal until the 1930s. Germ is basically now virus which for some reason, money I guess, won that war. But to me Terrain theory, once I was exposed to it, made far more sense than germ theory. And we're seeing it now where the virus as we all know did not cause any excess deaths last year but the vaccinations are this year (although not as much as claimed so far). The virus is as someone has noted so deadly that if we stopped talking about it we'd not notice it anymore.

Expand full comment