To my way of thinking, the world is at a major tipping point, the likes of which has not been seen in centuries. Brought on by the internet/world wide web.
Lots of things need revisiting and rethinking, including
* physics: did the big bang really happen?
* economics: the economics of scarcity needs rethinking
* medicine: do "vaccines" work or are they harmful?
* history: were the moon landings faked?
* lots of other things, no doubt
But the genocide/democide of the "great reset" and associated climate fraud needs to be stopped immediately and can't wait for consensus on these other things.
I studied climate science about a decade ago as a post grad (a diploma). I did my mini thesis on the Arctic. So to my mind there is no doubt that the Arctic is melting. CO2 was an easy way of explaining why despite the anomolies of the information from the past where CO2 levels had always followed warming caused by the Sun. So if not CO2 then what is causing this warming (which is also melting the glaciers here in the South Island by the way).
Genuine question.
There is also the issue that the likes of the WEF are undoubtedly using such warming for dystopian plans. But on the other side of this issue the fossil fuels* industry funds a lot of denial of any warming.
* I know the claim that they're not fossil which seems to have some legs but that's the current terminology.
Pretty sure I've seen that Zach broadcast before. He has one point of view I don't have anything that I object to too much although I've not really listened to him a lot and not all for 12 months or more.
I will respond though Elizabeth. While Sage was doing her/his best to undermine my substack you were supporting the hell out of her/him (truth is the handle is likely shared so who knows if you're dealing with a him or a her). You still are. Malicious is what I think you are while making the pretence that you're just being reasonable
Somewhat different than Frank, whoever Frank was, who I banned frequently from my page and did not let the worst of his comments stay on my blog.
Elizabeth replied to your comment on Matthew Crawford and Sage Hana.
"ll add one more piece. Think of how you want another to question germ theory and understand the nature of terrain and toxins. And what is a virus in actuality. And yet they can't. They might say, 'but I remember getting the polio vaccine.' As some one said to me recently. As if somehow getting the vaccine proved the existence if the disease or the nature of it, the cause of it. Someone not being able to question or believe something, does not make that something untrue. Something is either true or not. Our belief does not alter this."
-------------------
Editor said: You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
Elizabeth replied to your comment on Matthew Crawford and Sage Hana.
"But it is this behavior of yours right here. Telling me I am being malicious while pretending to be reasonable. As if being under suspicion is the norm, it's tiresome. And you have flipped on this as well about your perspective on me. I'm this, I'm that... back and forth, a few times. And yes I have been attracted to Sage's feed. More for the feed itself, but often for the humor of 'her' writing. I am not an ally of anyone. And I can listen and question whoever I choose. It tells you nothing of me. I don't know nor do I care if Frank is a man. I do think 'he' is better off without you. My following some of Sage's work does not mean I support the way 'she' wrote to you. I do not and never have. Her feed gives me a place to speak out and sometimes connect to others. Although I am tired of all of it. Yes you deleted some of Frank's words, but you also did other things more covert. You know this is true or not, it doesn't need proof. As I know who I am and my intentions. Your questioning them does not change their intent."
-------------------
Editor said: You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
Elizabeth replied to your comment on Matthew Crawford and Sage Hana.
"And why would we care. We are destroying this world of ours and sometimes all a person can say is 'she looks like a man!' As if that has any meaning. And yes if Sage is actually a man or a few different personalities, it is sad and tiresome."
-------------------
Editor said: You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
I havn't been to have a look now but I remember from last June/July. My comment above was just in relation to the deja vu occurring on my Substack again. Did I say something? LOL.
"came here because I read a piece by Stegiel and saw you had commented and wondered what you were up to. I'm not anyone's agent and my name's not Liz."
-------------------
You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
-------------------
Your first post here after not hearing from you for nearly a year was the same as when we left off. Extremely critical of me. And then when I respond (only partly in kind) you continued to use ad-hominem as a pretence to argument. When you are able to return without the criticism then maybe we can discuss things rather than people (mostly me but a bit of Frank whoever he, or she, was). Hope things work out for you Elizabeth. I did watch Zach's video, I think that he's too pessimistic.
I hope in time more people will recognize and so rise above the unconscious comments( made by State shills=meat bots and bots).
The facts vs lies, insults, threats and personal attacks. The low level attack stuff only appeals to those on the same level. Wokels( Fearful people). Often people can get triggered by the threats and insults back into (fear)an unconscious state(woke) .
You can see the memes of Caitlin Johnson( "CJ" ) a pseudo spiritualist controlled opposition narrative spinner are: pro CIA agent Assange , anti American pro Russian, us vs them, wont mention the convid.
People should consider how advanced the programmed commenting and content writing bots are now (they have their own popular blogs) . The purpose of Substack media get the elsewhere censored opposition narrative content , $ubscriptions, with in the depth "AI narrative learning bot" trying to find ways to disrupt the truth and running controlled opposition narrative content .
They have found it works to agree with one opposing thing( such as convid as the Central Bankster State know most people here dont believe in covid19) in order to sneakily push another part of the narrative meme. So its best to practice present moment awareness for clarity of mind.
Personally I don't think that her words are hers. I think she mostly acts as a proxy for Glenn Greenwald. Also her husbands parents were Russian spies with fake identities in the US and were arrested for it.
How odd to see my comment about harsh language, and Sage's reply, pop up here. I'm pretty sure that that was mine, anyway; it looks very familiar. I suspect that rubbed his/her fur the wrong way, as you can see. A later short comment about restricting comments to paid subscribers got me banned for 1,000 years. So far, I've served about 8 or 9 months on my sentence, only 999+ years to go.
Why do Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt both recommend "Sage Hana" on their stacks? This worries me.
I don't know. Sasha only comes into my mentions occasionally, Katherine even less.
Katherine Watt and Sash Latypova are saying some really important truths.
The FDA's sham support of poisoning the American public
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/the-fdas-sham-support-of-poisoning
Do either of them allow discussion of the 'no virus' position?
That might explain it if the answer is no.
I don't think they are focused on that.
To my way of thinking, the world is at a major tipping point, the likes of which has not been seen in centuries. Brought on by the internet/world wide web.
Lots of things need revisiting and rethinking, including
* physics: did the big bang really happen?
* economics: the economics of scarcity needs rethinking
* medicine: do "vaccines" work or are they harmful?
* history: were the moon landings faked?
* lots of other things, no doubt
But the genocide/democide of the "great reset" and associated climate fraud needs to be stopped immediately and can't wait for consensus on these other things.
"Virus/No Virus" I'm an MD and I Don't Care. Neither Should You
https://drrimatruthreports.substack.com/p/virusno-virus-im-an-md-and-i-dont
(I'm not an MD or a scientist)
I studied climate science about a decade ago as a post grad (a diploma). I did my mini thesis on the Arctic. So to my mind there is no doubt that the Arctic is melting. CO2 was an easy way of explaining why despite the anomolies of the information from the past where CO2 levels had always followed warming caused by the Sun. So if not CO2 then what is causing this warming (which is also melting the glaciers here in the South Island by the way).
Genuine question.
There is also the issue that the likes of the WEF are undoubtedly using such warming for dystopian plans. But on the other side of this issue the fossil fuels* industry funds a lot of denial of any warming.
* I know the claim that they're not fossil which seems to have some legs but that's the current terminology.
suspect its the sun
Astrophysicist Drops a Nuclear Bomb on the Entire Climate Change Narrative
https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/astrophysicist-drops-a-nuclear-bomb
Going to comment Nate?
Pretty sure I've seen that Zach broadcast before. He has one point of view I don't have anything that I object to too much although I've not really listened to him a lot and not all for 12 months or more.
I will respond though Elizabeth. While Sage was doing her/his best to undermine my substack you were supporting the hell out of her/him (truth is the handle is likely shared so who knows if you're dealing with a him or a her). You still are. Malicious is what I think you are while making the pretence that you're just being reasonable
Somewhat different than Frank, whoever Frank was, who I banned frequently from my page and did not let the worst of his comments stay on my blog.
Elizabeth replied to your comment on Matthew Crawford and Sage Hana.
"ll add one more piece. Think of how you want another to question germ theory and understand the nature of terrain and toxins. And what is a virus in actuality. And yet they can't. They might say, 'but I remember getting the polio vaccine.' As some one said to me recently. As if somehow getting the vaccine proved the existence if the disease or the nature of it, the cause of it. Someone not being able to question or believe something, does not make that something untrue. Something is either true or not. Our belief does not alter this."
-------------------
Editor said: You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
-------------------
I'll add one piece Elizabeth. You're an arsehole.
Elizabeth replied to your comment on Matthew Crawford and Sage Hana.
"But it is this behavior of yours right here. Telling me I am being malicious while pretending to be reasonable. As if being under suspicion is the norm, it's tiresome. And you have flipped on this as well about your perspective on me. I'm this, I'm that... back and forth, a few times. And yes I have been attracted to Sage's feed. More for the feed itself, but often for the humor of 'her' writing. I am not an ally of anyone. And I can listen and question whoever I choose. It tells you nothing of me. I don't know nor do I care if Frank is a man. I do think 'he' is better off without you. My following some of Sage's work does not mean I support the way 'she' wrote to you. I do not and never have. Her feed gives me a place to speak out and sometimes connect to others. Although I am tired of all of it. Yes you deleted some of Frank's words, but you also did other things more covert. You know this is true or not, it doesn't need proof. As I know who I am and my intentions. Your questioning them does not change their intent."
-------------------
Editor said: You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
-------------------
How do we know, btw, that Frank is a man?
Elizabeth replied to your comment on Matthew Crawford and Sage Hana.
"I should add that you are aware of whether or not I am on Sage's feed is exceedingly sad as well. Why would you care?"
-------------------
Editor said: You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
-------------------
Elizabeth replied to your comment on Matthew Crawford and Sage Hana.
"And why would we care. We are destroying this world of ours and sometimes all a person can say is 'she looks like a man!' As if that has any meaning. And yes if Sage is actually a man or a few different personalities, it is sad and tiresome."
-------------------
Editor said: You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
-------------------
I havn't been to have a look now but I remember from last June/July. My comment above was just in relation to the deja vu occurring on my Substack again. Did I say something? LOL.
What could be more misogynist than coming on to my substack on behalf of a man who has no cajones to do it himself, Liz?
Elizabeth said.
"came here because I read a piece by Stegiel and saw you had commented and wondered what you were up to. I'm not anyone's agent and my name's not Liz."
-------------------
You don't get to delete around here Elizabeth.
-------------------
Your first post here after not hearing from you for nearly a year was the same as when we left off. Extremely critical of me. And then when I respond (only partly in kind) you continued to use ad-hominem as a pretence to argument. When you are able to return without the criticism then maybe we can discuss things rather than people (mostly me but a bit of Frank whoever he, or she, was). Hope things work out for you Elizabeth. I did watch Zach's video, I think that he's too pessimistic.
I hope in time more people will recognize and so rise above the unconscious comments( made by State shills=meat bots and bots).
The facts vs lies, insults, threats and personal attacks. The low level attack stuff only appeals to those on the same level. Wokels( Fearful people). Often people can get triggered by the threats and insults back into (fear)an unconscious state(woke) .
You can see the memes of Caitlin Johnson( "CJ" ) a pseudo spiritualist controlled opposition narrative spinner are: pro CIA agent Assange , anti American pro Russian, us vs them, wont mention the convid.
People should consider how advanced the programmed commenting and content writing bots are now (they have their own popular blogs) . The purpose of Substack media get the elsewhere censored opposition narrative content , $ubscriptions, with in the depth "AI narrative learning bot" trying to find ways to disrupt the truth and running controlled opposition narrative content .
They have found it works to agree with one opposing thing( such as convid as the Central Bankster State know most people here dont believe in covid19) in order to sneakily push another part of the narrative meme. So its best to practice present moment awareness for clarity of mind.
Caitlyn Johnson......
Personally I don't think that her words are hers. I think she mostly acts as a proxy for Glenn Greenwald. Also her husbands parents were Russian spies with fake identities in the US and were arrested for it.
Yeah agree they use a controlled opposition narrative .
How odd to see my comment about harsh language, and Sage's reply, pop up here. I'm pretty sure that that was mine, anyway; it looks very familiar. I suspect that rubbed his/her fur the wrong way, as you can see. A later short comment about restricting comments to paid subscribers got me banned for 1,000 years. So far, I've served about 8 or 9 months on my sentence, only 999+ years to go.
Yes it's yours. I didn't want to out it as yours though so cut off your handle from the pic.
And then I outed myself . . . No worries.
I guess Sage must be an antonym
Yes more rage than sage.
Definitely think there is more than 1 Sage voice. At least 2 probably more.
It's a house of mirrors.
Thought something was fishy with Leader.
Thanks!