Ok Frances and Frank (how similar those names are) your posting privileges are now reinstated. But try your normal nonsense and you will be on 30 day bans before you can say 'spook'.
I guess my only real concern is that you are being attacked by other Substack authors who are here, ostensibly, because their work would not, or could not, be punished elsewhere because it does not conform to the establishment narrative. Why would such authors attack another author who is here for, presumably, the same reasons? It's like authors are turning on each other, and it's hard to understand why they would do that.
This blog is reorientating on Monday. I'm not sure what the Tuesday boys have planned (I've seen two references to it so far) but from Monday it's going to be Dunedin, Dunedin, Dunedin.
Being able to "police" (for lack of a better word) our own blogs to keep them civil, clean, and on topic while protecting free speech for all is what makes Substack a diamond in the rough. Thanks for the meticulous attention you give your page Rich.
Oh look Frank is back only a few hours after Frances signed in. Are you working in cahoots with each other. Is Cairn's theory that a diminutive, a feminine and a herb are 3 variants of the same virus valid?
Anyway I'm sure Plebeian subscribers are sick of such arguments so let's not shall we? I suggest that we keep to facts from now on. Aspersions on character can be done elsewhere.
Ok Frances and Frank (how similar those names are) your posting privileges are now reinstated. But try your normal nonsense and you will be on 30 day bans before you can say 'spook'.
Frances = feminine version of Francis
Frank = diminutive version of Francis
Sleader = typo for Slander
Frank = honest and sincere
Sage = wise and worthy
What's not to like.
(Edit: Hana = Haha)
Or Nana.
Right now I have 2/3 of the above trying to goad me into responding to them elsewhere so as they can claim victimhood. The poor little dears.
LOL
I guess my only real concern is that you are being attacked by other Substack authors who are here, ostensibly, because their work would not, or could not, be punished elsewhere because it does not conform to the establishment narrative. Why would such authors attack another author who is here for, presumably, the same reasons? It's like authors are turning on each other, and it's hard to understand why they would do that.
Maybe this conversation might help to explain some of it. People arn't always who they say they are;
https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/there-is-no-evidence-that-any-vaccine/comment/7923309
To me I don't know how "Jo" from that blog comes back from that.
Welcome back Frances (my new subscriber). Now remember to behave yourself.
Hmmm,
methinks that your language is quite rich yourself you know.
Oh well I might have to give myself 30 days out at some stage then.
I could do with a month off.
This blog is reorientating on Monday. I'm not sure what the Tuesday boys have planned (I've seen two references to it so far) but from Monday it's going to be Dunedin, Dunedin, Dunedin.
So cryptic you are.
Being able to "police" (for lack of a better word) our own blogs to keep them civil, clean, and on topic while protecting free speech for all is what makes Substack a diamond in the rough. Thanks for the meticulous attention you give your page Rich.
Thanks, and agree.
No cherry for you.
Oh look Frank is back only a few hours after Frances signed in. Are you working in cahoots with each other. Is Cairn's theory that a diminutive, a feminine and a herb are 3 variants of the same virus valid?
Good for you Frank. I've also noticed the same of you. How did you get these accounts of yours past ethics btw?
Anyway I'm sure Plebeian subscribers are sick of such arguments so let's not shall we? I suggest that we keep to facts from now on. Aspersions on character can be done elsewhere.