Rachel Stewart is part of the dystopia
Women especially would do well to trust her as far as they can kick her
Back in September I rang up Sean Plunket on The Platform an online radio station somewhat modelled on being the opposition to the Government narrative here in New Zealand. That part is clearly not true as the Wrights (who financially support the station) are in receipt of 200m a year from the NZ Government for their ‘childcare’ business. Anyway Sean Plunket put me on air and then immediately proceeded to attempt to undermine my candidacy for Council and Mayor here in Dunedin by just flat out lying about me, saying that I’d rung up earlier that morning and abused their staff. When I asked Sean for a time he said sometime between 7am and 8am. That was something that was not going to fly as I had been on another radio station at the time and so at that stage I called Sean Plunket a “lying arsehole”. His was a level of malicousness that I had not expected but I feel that in responding to him in such a fashion that at least I didn’t let him get away with it and I did manage to put him off his narrative as the last thing that he seemed to expect was being told so. I put in a police complaint about him shortly afterwards. That story is here.
I hung up on Sean after he let me say something very briefly about the Izzy Cook saga prevalent at the time and which Sean was trying to leverage as promotion for his station. I hung up because he was suggesting that I was unwell (for not agreeing with him) and this is a narrative that is coming constantly from the dystopian end of town right now.
Here’s Rachel Stewart, who has just banned me from her Substack, on the same topic.
For what? I had suggested that she go and hang out in a redneck state for a year as NZ was difficult for journalists such as herself to practice free speech in as everyone knew each other. I don’t have that post to hand as I didn’t screenshot it but here’s the conversation that ‘triggered’ Rachel.
The commentary is below the post about Sean Plunket who she is allowed to critique (in a ‘I like you Sean, please take notice of my criticism’ style) but others are not allowed to do so it seems especially not by suggesting that his station is government funded. The main emphasis of my critique of Sean on Rachel’s substack was that Sean was indeed Government funded which Rachel Stewart was very keen (without evidence) to refute.
I’m going to go further. It would seem to me that Rachel Stewart is ‘government funded’ and that is why she has banned me from her Substack. Of course Rachel has now banned me from her Substack (for a 100 years - always the sign of an agent provocateur around these parts) as well as blocking me on Twitter.
And further the very first section in her blog post indicates very strongly that Rachel is a very unpleasant person all too prepared to use a superior financial position to bully.
Either that or she’s lying as the tenants lease is not extinguished unless Rachel intends to live in the premises (New Zealand has terrible tenants rights laws). Either way her mindset is unpleasant.
And this is the kind of East German snitch society that New Zealand is trying to build here.
In regards to this here’s an Australian short on such a dystopia.
New Zealand sucks, it is too full of collaborating shits. And I will continue to point that out Rachel, whether you and yours like it or not.
We all only do things where we are getting something out of it. So what are you getting out of being involved with these people?
Hypocrisy update.
https://twitter.com/stew_rachel/status/1586549485748252674