26 Comments
User's avatar
Fay's avatar

We all only do things where we are getting something out of it. So what are you getting out of being involved with these people?

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

I try to reach their audience I guess. But it is problematic.

Expand full comment
Fay's avatar

It definitely is problematic, we can see that. You have to decide whether it is worth it or not.

These types don't usually change and sometimes for your own benefit you have stay away.

Maybe it is a question of timing, if you are patient it often happens that the right moment presents itself where you can get the opportunity to reach their audience.

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

Rachel banning me from her substack for something of that nature will have some asking questions of her I'd hope.

She is very sensitive about the quite obvious connections between government handouts and his station. So I'm guessing some sort of financial interest is involved.

Expand full comment
Tarn - mutual eye-rolling's avatar

Her Substack is very boring, you were doing her a favour by livening it up.

Expand full comment
Fay's avatar

I glanced through her Substack and like a lot of writers they prefer comments

agreeing with them - really saying next to nothing. However, she seems to be on the same page (anti-vx, trans, Sean). So, what did you say that caused a ban as we can't read banned comments?

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

She was very keen for me to agree that the Government was not funding Sean's little radio venture. This is her latest missive;

https://twitter.com/stew_rachel/status/1588027844202225664

Expand full comment
Richard Seager's avatar

And there's this. Rachel Stewart lives in Wanganui (or Whanganui if you prefer). And David Farrier's latest target is an antiques dealer who moved to Wanganui.

https://twitter.com/SeanPlunket/status/1587737979128193025

I have no idea what the relevance is but I figure that there is one.

Expand full comment