You tell me, Joe. I'm used to it from other platforms, for example Twitter, but enjoyed not having to put up with the flak for several months here. But am getting it in spades right now. Nevertheless happy enough that Substack seems to be taking no notice of their complaints.
It started with Mathew Crawford. Has not stopped since. I think it has a fair bit to do with germ theory, and my views on that, and Steve Kirsch.
Well, that makes sense. Still, one would think that, at least on Substack, your views would be at least tolerated, even if they conflicted with others'. FWIW, trying to convince germ theory enthusiasts that they have been led astray can be a bridge too far, much like trying to convince a convidian that the whole plandemic was a hoax. Truly sorry for your plight.
The other possibility is that my post on the WEF young global leaders, which is all over Twitter, attracts those who would rather it wasn't there. Whatever it is, it's not a logical position that can be argued out.
I spotted that you were shocked at the post by Rich. What he did not show in his post was the many previous days of stalking, harassing and character assassination he had peppered me with. He also did the same to two other female writers on Substack.
It possibly isn't. But the internet has a lot of Frances Leader about. Hive, Twitter, Off Guardian, here. And most of the material is moronic. The Tartaria stuff for example. And Frances is very abusive to those who disagree, on 5g for example. I think that Frances is far from genuine. With 5g I'm certain there are issues with it but I don't want Frances Leader pushing any opposition to it. With the cohoax (as you put it somewhat accurately) I've only seen a few posts on Off Guardian, but there too there is some conflict.
Because she's abusive when someone comes forward with information that disputes her version, mostly. But also because there's been a lot of research on 5g from sources that don't post about Tartaria and consequently are more likely to get traction for the issues due to their lack of 'crazy'.
I havn't seen much of her MHRA nor 5g. I've just been seeking to protect myself from her ever since she went off at me for questioning Max Igan. And recently she told me to fuck off from my own blog when I pointed out that her post about 5g was purely anecdote with no evidence to back up the claims made.
It's not that I don't think that the claims about 5g have no evidence to back them up, nor substance. It's just that I want to see that evidence. Not anecdote.
Also recently Frances has been all over Substack claiming that I'm some sort of spy or agent of State. So someone who does that, well I don't trust them.
And one other thing, I've used 'she' above. But some of those interactions certainly didn't make me assume 'she'. Anybody with the required log-in and password can post as 'Frances'.
Rappoport and Icke are not names I'd happily associate with but you do you, Frances. Whoever you is. I don't even believe in the person who has turned up at fracking protests. Shill? Actress? You sure look like one.
By the way I'm not replying to you on Stegiel's blog. I've already allowed myself to allow you to spam it too much. And more spam here or more personal invective will get you another 24 hours out.
I see. Remarkable. Frames my post of yesterday with made in NZ and not Mexicali wood. There are lots of mixed nuts online out numbering those in government. Some are grateful for Covid shots amputating the forebrain, others certain of Biblical numerology, still others vote Democrat and think Biden has a disability of stuttering. The mental fight continues. O clouds unfold, bring me my chariots of fire. I think you are right Rich. We can ignore the imbecility and not become bogged down.
What on earth have you done to these people, if anything, to deserve this?
You tell me, Joe. I'm used to it from other platforms, for example Twitter, but enjoyed not having to put up with the flak for several months here. But am getting it in spades right now. Nevertheless happy enough that Substack seems to be taking no notice of their complaints.
It started with Mathew Crawford. Has not stopped since. I think it has a fair bit to do with germ theory, and my views on that, and Steve Kirsch.
Well, that makes sense. Still, one would think that, at least on Substack, your views would be at least tolerated, even if they conflicted with others'. FWIW, trying to convince germ theory enthusiasts that they have been led astray can be a bridge too far, much like trying to convince a convidian that the whole plandemic was a hoax. Truly sorry for your plight.
Thanks. It can get rather insane.
The other possibility is that my post on the WEF young global leaders, which is all over Twitter, attracts those who would rather it wasn't there. Whatever it is, it's not a logical position that can be argued out.
Frances comment on Stegiel's page:
"Frances Leader
Writes Uncensored
34 min ago
I spotted that you were shocked at the post by Rich. What he did not show in his post was the many previous days of stalking, harassing and character assassination he had peppered me with. He also did the same to two other female writers on Substack.
He is a bad guy."
Thanks YYR. Seems to be doing exactly the thing they're accusing me of.
I can't believe this is the same Frances Leader who pursued the MHRA for lack of evidence of the cohoax.
It possibly isn't. But the internet has a lot of Frances Leader about. Hive, Twitter, Off Guardian, here. And most of the material is moronic. The Tartaria stuff for example. And Frances is very abusive to those who disagree, on 5g for example. I think that Frances is far from genuine. With 5g I'm certain there are issues with it but I don't want Frances Leader pushing any opposition to it. With the cohoax (as you put it somewhat accurately) I've only seen a few posts on Off Guardian, but there too there is some conflict.
Why do you not want Frances leader pushing opposition to 5G?
Not aware about the Off guardian material; I only know of her post from her Hive blog re: MHRA exchange of FOI.
Because she's abusive when someone comes forward with information that disputes her version, mostly. But also because there's been a lot of research on 5g from sources that don't post about Tartaria and consequently are more likely to get traction for the issues due to their lack of 'crazy'.
I havn't seen much of her MHRA nor 5g. I've just been seeking to protect myself from her ever since she went off at me for questioning Max Igan. And recently she told me to fuck off from my own blog when I pointed out that her post about 5g was purely anecdote with no evidence to back up the claims made.
It's not that I don't think that the claims about 5g have no evidence to back them up, nor substance. It's just that I want to see that evidence. Not anecdote.
Also recently Frances has been all over Substack claiming that I'm some sort of spy or agent of State. So someone who does that, well I don't trust them.
And one other thing, I've used 'she' above. But some of those interactions certainly didn't make me assume 'she'. Anybody with the required log-in and password can post as 'Frances'.
Rappoport and Icke are not names I'd happily associate with but you do you, Frances. Whoever you is. I don't even believe in the person who has turned up at fracking protests. Shill? Actress? You sure look like one.
By the way I'm not replying to you on Stegiel's blog. I've already allowed myself to allow you to spam it too much. And more spam here or more personal invective will get you another 24 hours out.
It's sad that some people are incapable of intelligent discourse.
To rely on insult and personal attacks is the hallmark of an ignorant individual.
I try hard not to reply in kind but I am not always successful.
I see. Remarkable. Frames my post of yesterday with made in NZ and not Mexicali wood. There are lots of mixed nuts online out numbering those in government. Some are grateful for Covid shots amputating the forebrain, others certain of Biblical numerology, still others vote Democrat and think Biden has a disability of stuttering. The mental fight continues. O clouds unfold, bring me my chariots of fire. I think you are right Rich. We can ignore the imbecility and not become bogged down.
Ok that's good enough for another 24 hours out.