Thank you for the warning. So far I have not noticed anything on Substack. But I know lots of bloggers have accounts on other channels as well. I have subscribed to most of them on these alternative channels in case Substack were to censor. Please keep us updated.
The times are getting more and more interesting... This tells me that while it is not a happy thing for we, the People, censorship tightening is a sign that the tide is definitely turning... for TRUTH. I also have protonmail, and of course, it flags itself as a one of the "Good Guys," but it's difficult to hide the fact that you are censoring people, if you are censoring people. SO, we have to carry on, not resisting the evil, but WORKING AROUND IT. I think that the ultimate goal, of mine, anyway, is to connect with people IN OUR COMMUNITIES, IN REAL LIFE, and I am NOT saying it's not important to be able to find out what's going on... But maybe, in the long run, this will be a good thing, in a way. We'll figure out how to do what needs doing, because that's what we do. We humans are a tenacious lot, and we are very smart, very resourceful, clever, BRILLIANT, and determined... EYES ON THE PRIZE. Let's get out into Real Life, as it were, and connect... Because you KNOW that is the thing that frightens the Bad Guys the most. Onward.
I am noticing various folks are ending up in my spam since last week or so, I use protonmail so it could be related to that. But def more spams to rescue now, Pierre Korys page among them. Hmm..
And seems I am having reduced notices in general, for how many folks I sub to. We should take the inclusion as a highly esteemed shill doc E R I C T O P A L......(already months ago) as a sign Substack had to make concessions to the TNI. That was a warning shot to me that only a few took seriously.
I am consoled slightly by the fact that they may have missed their window, and cats are out of bags now wrt the injected illnesses. Sharpen your shovel.
That would be fine, if they were providing these guys with reasons. But they're not. So one is left with the suspicion that Substack is banning dissidents on the basis of;
Someone with pull at Substack doesn't like what these guys said.
or
Authorities are in their ears (much like lavabit) and they're not allowed to say why.
Did you want to take up Steve Kirsch's offer of debating ivermectin and hydroxochloroquine with Pierre Kory and others? That would be more effective dissidence than spamming here, no?
And kudos to Substack.
Tex (Substack, Inc)
Jun 15, 2022, 11:44 AM EDT
Hi Rich,
Tex here from Substack Trust & Safety. Thanks for taking the time to submit this appeal.
It appears that one of our platform safety detection mechanisms erroneously flagged the comments as spam. I've reactivated his account.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Please don't hesitate to reach out if there's any other way I can assist.
Best,
Tex @ Substack
Thank you for the warning. So far I have not noticed anything on Substack. But I know lots of bloggers have accounts on other channels as well. I have subscribed to most of them on these alternative channels in case Substack were to censor. Please keep us updated.
The times are getting more and more interesting... This tells me that while it is not a happy thing for we, the People, censorship tightening is a sign that the tide is definitely turning... for TRUTH. I also have protonmail, and of course, it flags itself as a one of the "Good Guys," but it's difficult to hide the fact that you are censoring people, if you are censoring people. SO, we have to carry on, not resisting the evil, but WORKING AROUND IT. I think that the ultimate goal, of mine, anyway, is to connect with people IN OUR COMMUNITIES, IN REAL LIFE, and I am NOT saying it's not important to be able to find out what's going on... But maybe, in the long run, this will be a good thing, in a way. We'll figure out how to do what needs doing, because that's what we do. We humans are a tenacious lot, and we are very smart, very resourceful, clever, BRILLIANT, and determined... EYES ON THE PRIZE. Let's get out into Real Life, as it were, and connect... Because you KNOW that is the thing that frightens the Bad Guys the most. Onward.
I am noticing various folks are ending up in my spam since last week or so, I use protonmail so it could be related to that. But def more spams to rescue now, Pierre Korys page among them. Hmm..
And seems I am having reduced notices in general, for how many folks I sub to. We should take the inclusion as a highly esteemed shill doc E R I C T O P A L......(already months ago) as a sign Substack had to make concessions to the TNI. That was a warning shot to me that only a few took seriously.
I am consoled slightly by the fact that they may have missed their window, and cats are out of bags now wrt the injected illnesses. Sharpen your shovel.
Yes Mr Erik was that, I agree.
What did they write about?
There's a link there. But his blog has gone private.
I just went and had a look. Getting a little too close to the truth I think.
I subscribed straight away! 😍
He might have been mad with me for putting him in the post. I did tell him that I was going to though. Assuming R*r is a he.
Hmmm, I assumed he was a he too. He might be a she. He might be a trans. Might have to ask his preferred pronouns.
I don't think that R fits the non binary profile. Although I think some of them might be waking up at this stage.
I read that link. I agree with those rules. I even added a couple of my own.
You should be fine. As an author, those rules should be standard to you anyway.
That would be fine, if they were providing these guys with reasons. But they're not. So one is left with the suspicion that Substack is banning dissidents on the basis of;
Someone with pull at Substack doesn't like what these guys said.
or
Authorities are in their ears (much like lavabit) and they're not allowed to say why.
It'd be fun if SS actually quoted all the things that cannot be said.
They've actually unbanned Stegiel now.
You cant test it out if you want. On your own blog.
re the edit "I guess this is why my special injections cause so much discomfort. Not virus-like at all."
And again, no.
I know it is.
You can still post. I only remove the ones that need to be removed. The 'you can't shout fire' rule.
Did you want to take up Steve Kirsch's offer of debating ivermectin and hydroxochloroquine with Pierre Kory and others? That would be more effective dissidence than spamming here, no?