I get annoyed with those who have posts for paid subscribers. There is no way at present that I can pay to read substack posts. If the information is important then ideally it should be free so it can be widely disseminated.
We can recognize the existence of toxins and their geographical and or age-stratified distribution, and we can treat people accordingly. The advice to live healthy, is universal regardless of that premise.
In these times, I think one must be careful not to burn bridges too easily. You need community and you need to be able to have an hones discussion with those who do not assume the same axioms as you do.
Belief is a tool. Do not let your beliefs lock you away from learning.
We all have to learn. We all have very important lessons yet to learn from this.
We don't see proteins either Marius. I don't have faith in either narrative. You don't have to believe in science, that is an oxymoron. Science is about mental models and most importantly about verifying those mental models.
We can't "see" viruses (although there's supposedly techniques to visualize them with electron microscopy). We can't see proteins (same thing).
But we can see disease. That is what we can agree on.
There's several levels of intoxication going on. But an open mind considers the other points of view without prejudice. That is what true science does.
That's why the virology is fake, because it doesn't follow the scientific method.
Stefan Lanka proved it by performing the control experiment, showing that the conditions of the experiment cause the cytopathic effect, not the supposed 'virus'.
Gosh, one of the last things I expected to see on a platform that bills itself as censorship free is, well, censorship. What the heck happened to Substack?
There's always been censorship on Substack as it's in the purview of the writers not the platform. There can't help but be in honesty, I tried the other route but it failed as several posters decided to test it. Sage Hana mostly, a moron from who knows where (Moscow?).
I still will not be censoring as much as others. For example there's no paywall on comments here as there is on many Substack blogs. Did you want to take your complaints to those?
Please don't misunderstand; I'm not complaining. I am just surprised to find any censorship on a platform where I didn't expect to see it. Appreciate your thoughts, though.
Save your slings and arrows for your planned article. Nothing like a war of words to drum up excitement and interest. If we all agree it would be boring. He's got that smarmy superiority thing strong.
May 1, 2022·edited May 1, 2022Liked by Richard Seager
I've responded to him. I've unfollowed him. People can be precious at times.
Substers complain about censorship and lack of free speech on the bird and face, yet some also censor views they don't like on Substack! Oh, the hypocrisy. I had to unfollow one Sub, Matriarchi Years, on her request. She was peeved with me for dissing her for parroting "their" words like "antivaxxers". That was the last straw for her!
Dr Toby Rogers DELETED a youtube link - yes, a youtube link - where South Park sang Dreidel! I could not believe my eyes! Toby, who waxed lyrical about the necessity of free speech! And that link was tangentially relevant to his post!
Yes it's a very Twitterish attempt. And I have a whole new list of substackers that I don't trust now as well as about 3 hours of sleep. Most of them were already on my 'probably shit' list, some of them not. Good to get the confirmation but in other ways it's disappointing to see it appear here on Substack. Right now trying to figure out what their role is and who, or what, they act on interests of. Strange to see some of them there, joining in the dissing, like the British iodine cure advocate, Monsieur Noakes.
Crawford has pushed it out to Twitter but only one response there as he doesn't seem to have a lot of followers on that platform.
I'm also wondering if Robert Malone's team of Swedes 'compiling' a list of WEF insiders includes Rikard who comes across as the biggest pr*&k on Matthew's right now.
"the British iodine cure advocate, Monsieur Noakes."
Iodine is legit - Dr Peter Mc endorses it. Notice that they add iodine to the processed white salt? Iodine is a necessity; especially for our thyroid. People in poor countries suffer from iodine deficiency through a lack of seafood. Big lumpy throat is a tell-tale sign.
I am actually starting to wonder how many of our billionaires are just strawmen. Musk certainly seems to be one and I've always thought that Branson was. And can you convert strawmanism into real billionairism?
Many books are written about the danger of all vaccines. Not just this one. Susanne Humphries is probably the best documented, but there are others, and quite a bit. A doctor should do no harm. But if you know that in the last years, each year about 80 or more children die from Measles jabs, and none of measles, that should tell you something.
There are many on the topic, going all the way back to Edward Jenner but especially it seems in the 1850-1950 range. I don't know of the one you mention but I purchased several about 6 months ago and am slowly getting through them.
Dissolving Illusions, Dr Suzanne Humphries. Death by Injection, by Eustace Mullins, just finished, gives the history of how America came to be in such bad situation, with AMA and other letter words, most without any doctors, ruling the med world. So sad.
Just leaving it vague but not that vague. At this stage I consider him to be the most malicious of substackers so those who find their way there can still see it. Some of it is lies though and several of my responses have been deleted. So I'd have to use my screen snapz to tell the actual story rather than the lies that he's left there.
And I might do that at some stage. Had planned a post on some male trans-humanists who are pretending to be on women's side of the transgender argument while being involved in the completely idiotic push to to the melding of IT and biology which is at the base of the push for transgender "rights". This is similar in regards to Covid and crypto coins. In my view David Martin falls into this as well. "Not their crypto coin, but ours".
think it’s no coincidence that i’ve had major interference with both my iPhone and Substack after wondering out loud whether ‘covid’ was a cover for toxic biologic effects of EM and whether injectables exacerbate the damage.
This is mainly just a guy who's trying to sell bitcoin on the back of the Covid hysteria (to me these guys are a dime a dozen) but others are using the opportunity to have a go as well. Whether there's collusion or not, who knows. Normally on Twitter the request is just sent out and if you're aware of it it's a good time to lock up your account for a few days.
I don't have any issues with my phone but then I hardly use it and it doesn't go out with me.
Good advice, and Rich’s, too. I realized a while back (likely when it was clear Utah was going all-in with digital ID) that the days of me using a smart phone would need to come to an end. They might try to force the issue down the road. I recently purchased a Fields Note type of set-up, the kind of thing I used to use before I bought the iPhone 4. My wife is not so inclined.
I get annoyed with those who have posts for paid subscribers. There is no way at present that I can pay to read substack posts. If the information is important then ideally it should be free so it can be widely disseminated.
Viruses deliver toxins. The reason why the theory exists and persists is because of contagion.
The existence or non-existence of viruses does not preclude intoxication and approaches to deal with it.
In the context of covid / spike protein, here is one such protocol:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/spike-protein-detox-guide/
We can recognize the existence of toxins and their geographical and or age-stratified distribution, and we can treat people accordingly. The advice to live healthy, is universal regardless of that premise.
In these times, I think one must be careful not to burn bridges too easily. You need community and you need to be able to have an hones discussion with those who do not assume the same axioms as you do.
Belief is a tool. Do not let your beliefs lock you away from learning.
We all have to learn. We all have very important lessons yet to learn from this.
Viruses do not deliver toxins, because they don't exist.
It's the other way around, actually.
Toxic proteins and other toxins are attributes to 'viruses' (a placeholder for stuff we don't know about, like 'God' or other fairytales).
We don't see proteins either Marius. I don't have faith in either narrative. You don't have to believe in science, that is an oxymoron. Science is about mental models and most importantly about verifying those mental models.
BTW, what do you mean by "we don't see proteins"?
Because the spike protein is the heart and soul of the 'vaccines', and it is toxic.
We can't "see" viruses (although there's supposedly techniques to visualize them with electron microscopy). We can't see proteins (same thing).
But we can see disease. That is what we can agree on.
There's several levels of intoxication going on. But an open mind considers the other points of view without prejudice. That is what true science does.
I don't disagree with that at all.
It's just that the pathogenic viruses, flying from host to host hasn't met their burden of proof at all,that's all.
Exactly.
That's why the virology is fake, because it doesn't follow the scientific method.
Stefan Lanka proved it by performing the control experiment, showing that the conditions of the experiment cause the cytopathic effect, not the supposed 'virus'.
Fair enough comment, Aion.
Gosh, one of the last things I expected to see on a platform that bills itself as censorship free is, well, censorship. What the heck happened to Substack?
There's always been censorship on Substack as it's in the purview of the writers not the platform. There can't help but be in honesty, I tried the other route but it failed as several posters decided to test it. Sage Hana mostly, a moron from who knows where (Moscow?).
I still will not be censoring as much as others. For example there's no paywall on comments here as there is on many Substack blogs. Did you want to take your complaints to those?
Please don't misunderstand; I'm not complaining. I am just surprised to find any censorship on a platform where I didn't expect to see it. Appreciate your thoughts, though.
No problems, I shouldn't be so defensive.
Here's your paid subscriptions.
bad cattitude
CJ Hopkins
The Dossier
The Good Citizen
Margaret Anna Alice Through the Looking Glass
The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter
News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller
Sage’s Newsletter
Teresa's Impromptu Scribblings
The Truth Barrier
Unacceptable Jessica
Unreported Truths
They seem to have removed https://paracelsusdoc.substack.com/, but refuse to explain.
Just had a look, it doesn't seem that it deserved a ban. Not by a long way.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220325050548/https://paracelsusdoc.substack.com/p/you-can-thank-the-civil-war-for-pfizer?s=r
paracelsus welcome to throw his articles up here.
I hate to ask the obvious, but did he maybe die? Maybe the family took it down?
I am totally shocked if Substack did...intersting articles.
I'd actually forgotten about this one. Yes they were interesting articles.
Substack claimed he took it down himself.
Is that possibly true?
Seems enigmatic. You'd think he would at least have made some sort of announcement.
Well I guess I'm hoping that Substack doesn't go Twitter on us.
Hopefully he took it down. But it's a good substack so he should put it back up again.
Could be Greenpeace tactics=. but there are plenty of trolls, some paid, some bored. Let it slide off your shield.
And this? (would like your thoughts on it)
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/time-economics-and-basic-politeness
Respond or let it slide? There's a lot of libel there.
Save your slings and arrows for your planned article. Nothing like a war of words to drum up excitement and interest. If we all agree it would be boring. He's got that smarmy superiority thing strong.
Thanks. And agree.
I warned you, Rich, to expect a knock on your door, or roof, soon, from that article of yours re Musk... :)
If you keep your posts professional, as writers should, then you should be fine.
Opinion?
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/time-economics-and-basic-politeness
I sent a comment there. Look-see. He was a bit peeved with me when we had our debate re bitCON.
Some people are a bit sensitive with colourful language.
(I've been watching the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case in Australia. They don't bleep out the f and c words!)
I have replied in kind as you've probably seen but kept it short. Seems obsessive for a substacker with 450 subscribers (that's me) unless;
1. Klaus doesn't like my list.
2. Pharma doesn't like my 'ain't no such thing as a virus'
3. Coin Inc doesn't like my view on shit coins
4. All of the above
It's hard not to notice that he had no interest in his own Substack post.
Also noted that one or two mouthy substackers joined in. Well one.
I guess a few think that they have to choose between us. Well personally I couldn't care less. If someone wants to follow him, fine.
I actually paid money to comment on his blog. I guess that's a way of trying to censor out the voices that you don't like. Worst $8 that I've spent.
I've responded to him. I've unfollowed him. People can be precious at times.
Substers complain about censorship and lack of free speech on the bird and face, yet some also censor views they don't like on Substack! Oh, the hypocrisy. I had to unfollow one Sub, Matriarchi Years, on her request. She was peeved with me for dissing her for parroting "their" words like "antivaxxers". That was the last straw for her!
Dr Toby Rogers DELETED a youtube link - yes, a youtube link - where South Park sang Dreidel! I could not believe my eyes! Toby, who waxed lyrical about the necessity of free speech! And that link was tangentially relevant to his post!
Yes it's a very Twitterish attempt. And I have a whole new list of substackers that I don't trust now as well as about 3 hours of sleep. Most of them were already on my 'probably shit' list, some of them not. Good to get the confirmation but in other ways it's disappointing to see it appear here on Substack. Right now trying to figure out what their role is and who, or what, they act on interests of. Strange to see some of them there, joining in the dissing, like the British iodine cure advocate, Monsieur Noakes.
Crawford has pushed it out to Twitter but only one response there as he doesn't seem to have a lot of followers on that platform.
I'm also wondering if Robert Malone's team of Swedes 'compiling' a list of WEF insiders includes Rikard who comes across as the biggest pr*&k on Matthew's right now.
"the British iodine cure advocate, Monsieur Noakes."
Iodine is legit - Dr Peter Mc endorses it. Notice that they add iodine to the processed white salt? Iodine is a necessity; especially for our thyroid. People in poor countries suffer from iodine deficiency through a lack of seafood. Big lumpy throat is a tell-tale sign.
In some ways this was an essay for Substack admin. I've also all the 'receipts' if they need them.
I am actually starting to wonder how many of our billionaires are just strawmen. Musk certainly seems to be one and I've always thought that Branson was. And can you convert strawmanism into real billionairism?
Too hard to know until it is too late. Why do you think "they" control information flow for?
As I said, there are NO "free" billionaires, nor multi-millionaires. There are no free millions.
Remarkable.
Many books are written about the danger of all vaccines. Not just this one. Susanne Humphries is probably the best documented, but there are others, and quite a bit. A doctor should do no harm. But if you know that in the last years, each year about 80 or more children die from Measles jabs, and none of measles, that should tell you something.
There are many on the topic, going all the way back to Edward Jenner but especially it seems in the 1850-1950 range. I don't know of the one you mention but I purchased several about 6 months ago and am slowly getting through them.
Dissolving Illusions, Dr Suzanne Humphries. Death by Injection, by Eustace Mullins, just finished, gives the history of how America came to be in such bad situation, with AMA and other letter words, most without any doctors, ruling the med world. So sad.
Matthew?
Just leaving it vague but not that vague. At this stage I consider him to be the most malicious of substackers so those who find their way there can still see it. Some of it is lies though and several of my responses have been deleted. So I'd have to use my screen snapz to tell the actual story rather than the lies that he's left there.
And I might do that at some stage. Had planned a post on some male trans-humanists who are pretending to be on women's side of the transgender argument while being involved in the completely idiotic push to to the melding of IT and biology which is at the base of the push for transgender "rights". This is similar in regards to Covid and crypto coins. In my view David Martin falls into this as well. "Not their crypto coin, but ours".
A post would be good as it's all new news to me.
But it might need an essay.
Your Substack is growing in leaps and bounds. Influencers get targeted.
Surprising to see the number of subscribes after this post.
Someone must have linked to you on a big-name Substack.
Possibly. When Eugyppius did that a while ago, I'd wake up in the morning to 100s of responses for a few days.
think it’s no coincidence that i’ve had major interference with both my iPhone and Substack after wondering out loud whether ‘covid’ was a cover for toxic biologic effects of EM and whether injectables exacerbate the damage.
smell something rotten...
This is mainly just a guy who's trying to sell bitcoin on the back of the Covid hysteria (to me these guys are a dime a dozen) but others are using the opportunity to have a go as well. Whether there's collusion or not, who knows. Normally on Twitter the request is just sent out and if you're aware of it it's a good time to lock up your account for a few days.
I don't have any issues with my phone but then I hardly use it and it doesn't go out with me.
I find wearing a good old-fashioned watch gets me to places on time.
Good advice, and Rich’s, too. I realized a while back (likely when it was clear Utah was going all-in with digital ID) that the days of me using a smart phone would need to come to an end. They might try to force the issue down the road. I recently purchased a Fields Note type of set-up, the kind of thing I used to use before I bought the iPhone 4. My wife is not so inclined.
Yeah I never used the features of the smart phone so leaving it at home is not a big deal.
Just ban forever.