James' IPAK edu has some interesting associations I have to say. And teaching a course on virology as proof of virology, that's quite a circular justification that is. Jessica Rose, maybe you'd like to comment? Also if you do wander past could you comment on why you thought not to address Kevin and others in your email chain on their misogynistic abuse towards Christine Massey and (allegedly) Sam Bailey?
Jul 29, 2022·edited Jul 30, 2022Liked by Richard Seager
If their God falls the entire construct collapses.
They will preserve their God by any means possible.
Whether it is from a fish market, a lab leak, random evolution, man made conspiracy. They will bring all the theories in the world just to distract us from what is actually happening.
Unfortunately their arrogance owns them. They are Inferring they are ‘science’. Emotion Is blinding them. I’m not saying they are incorrect, or correct. When you use words to discredit individuals you have lost the argument no matter how close to the truth.
It's nearly impossible to have sincere faith in anyone, especially someone in the public eye, who issues a challenge and then weasels out of it, more than once. My sense is that Steve enjoys the attention and the publicity he gets from all this, and doesn't want to risk killing that golden goose by losing a debate that he initiated. He strikes me as an opportunist.
Jul 29, 2022·edited Jul 29, 2022Liked by Richard Seager
Steve must be quite well-informed about most details of the globalists' plan and progress.
Possibly, he is controlled opposition, because he initiates a lot of things, but literally fails to achieve anything. In that case, he is part of the theater.
Alternatively, he might believe in incremental process, because if he declared the truth (there is no "infectious virus, only poisoning from all sides"), it is he, who would be called a nutcase, and would lose all media coverage. Kennedy (CHD) actually succeeds every once in a while in his lawsuits.
Steve definitely blocks his followers' progress by making them believe that knowledge itself empowers (it doesn't) and that one day, "we" (which usually means someone else) will defeat the cabal. That sort of thing doesn't get anyone anywhere, except promotes inaction among people:
Thesis: Steve Kirsch is both stupid and being used
Mark Bailey's very substantial response to these attacks is here (in an interview with Sol Luckman).
https://solluckman.substack.com/p/settling-the-virus-debate-once-and
Has Steve offered a million dollars for other plandemic *proofs*?
Guy Hatchard was just yesterday putting Steve in the to be commended category, which didn't fit with the rest of Guy's point.
James' IPAK edu has some interesting associations I have to say. And teaching a course on virology as proof of virology, that's quite a circular justification that is. Jessica Rose, maybe you'd like to comment? Also if you do wander past could you comment on why you thought not to address Kevin and others in your email chain on their misogynistic abuse towards Christine Massey and (allegedly) Sam Bailey?
If their God falls the entire construct collapses.
They will preserve their God by any means possible.
Whether it is from a fish market, a lab leak, random evolution, man made conspiracy. They will bring all the theories in the world just to distract us from what is actually happening.
Let us declare: Your god is dead.
Unfortunately their arrogance owns them. They are Inferring they are ‘science’. Emotion Is blinding them. I’m not saying they are incorrect, or correct. When you use words to discredit individuals you have lost the argument no matter how close to the truth.
It's nearly impossible to have sincere faith in anyone, especially someone in the public eye, who issues a challenge and then weasels out of it, more than once. My sense is that Steve enjoys the attention and the publicity he gets from all this, and doesn't want to risk killing that golden goose by losing a debate that he initiated. He strikes me as an opportunist.
Steve must be quite well-informed about most details of the globalists' plan and progress.
Possibly, he is controlled opposition, because he initiates a lot of things, but literally fails to achieve anything. In that case, he is part of the theater.
Alternatively, he might believe in incremental process, because if he declared the truth (there is no "infectious virus, only poisoning from all sides"), it is he, who would be called a nutcase, and would lose all media coverage. Kennedy (CHD) actually succeeds every once in a while in his lawsuits.
Steve definitely blocks his followers' progress by making them believe that knowledge itself empowers (it doesn't) and that one day, "we" (which usually means someone else) will defeat the cabal. That sort of thing doesn't get anyone anywhere, except promotes inaction among people:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/paid-agents-or-simple-morons
I personally think that Steve is one of the actors like Mallone.
This is waste of time. Steve is doing a lot of good. He doesn't claim to be perfect. This is like Berenson attacking Mallone. It isn't helping anyone.