Exemptions to masks are broad and wide-ranging in the current legislation. (I expect that's by design because the half-wits enforcing it have some idea of the legal liabilities if they didn't.)
Not being a lawyer I can't comment on any legal warfare that may be appropriate, but that's the angle I'd press here.
Banning a candidate from a debate leading up to an election by refusing to honor a mask exemption would be pretty silly of Philip and lead to lots of bad publicity.
Even the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Protection Framework) Order 2021 (SL 2021/386), [sofar as it is lawful, but it is what the likes of Phlip rely on, not having read it] recognises (Section 11. 3(a)(ii)) that wearing a mask may not suit, so doesn't need to be done, cannot be demanded.
Its illegal to try to force/coerce a human being to wear a mask.
Its not mandatory to wear a mask ,they cant make it legal .
Mandates are mind control 101 .They only have to make you believe you dont have a choice and thats when you give up your freedom.
You can choose to wear a mask..I dont know why as its been found so far to be unhealthy mentally and breathing in toxins ... why would you .
Your dr hasn't prescribed you to wear what is a medical device( mask) so it would be a breach of Nuremberg code and the law if he tried to forced you to wear one or excluded you from election /political process because you refused to and had chose not to.
Exemptions to masks are broad and wide-ranging in the current legislation. (I expect that's by design because the half-wits enforcing it have some idea of the legal liabilities if they didn't.)
Not being a lawyer I can't comment on any legal warfare that may be appropriate, but that's the angle I'd press here.
Banning a candidate from a debate leading up to an election by refusing to honor a mask exemption would be pretty silly of Philip and lead to lots of bad publicity.
Good on you for standing up for what you, and anyone with any brain, believes in.
Dreadful that that church torments its parishioners and considers old people to be easily manipulated idiots.
When the collaborators are arrested and asked about their actions, what defence will Philip try?
I suggest he looks to his future and gets his act together quicko, starting with a public apology to Richard.
Even the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Protection Framework) Order 2021 (SL 2021/386), [sofar as it is lawful, but it is what the likes of Phlip rely on, not having read it] recognises (Section 11. 3(a)(ii)) that wearing a mask may not suit, so doesn't need to be done, cannot be demanded.
Can an invitation be withdrawn after it has been accepted? (Rhetorical question)
Poor Philip is insane.
Its illegal to try to force/coerce a human being to wear a mask.
Its not mandatory to wear a mask ,they cant make it legal .
Mandates are mind control 101 .They only have to make you believe you dont have a choice and thats when you give up your freedom.
You can choose to wear a mask..I dont know why as its been found so far to be unhealthy mentally and breathing in toxins ... why would you .
Your dr hasn't prescribed you to wear what is a medical device( mask) so it would be a breach of Nuremberg code and the law if he tried to forced you to wear one or excluded you from election /political process because you refused to and had chose not to.
https://notpublicaddress.wordpress.com/2022/02/16/the-mandate-of-freedom/